In vivo study of the pulp reaction to Fuji IX, a glass ionomer cement

2000 ◽  
Vol 28 (6) ◽  
pp. 413-422 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Six ◽  
J.-J. Lasfargues ◽  
M. Goldberg
2015 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 74 ◽  
Author(s):  
PriyankaL Kalimireddy ◽  
AR Prabhakar ◽  
Chandrashekar Yavagal ◽  
S Sugandhan

1993 ◽  
Vol 27 (5) ◽  
pp. 417-423 ◽  
Author(s):  
K.L. Weerheijm ◽  
J.J. de Soet ◽  
W.E. van Amerongen ◽  
J. de Graaff

2017 ◽  
Vol 25 (5) ◽  
pp. 541-550 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cristiane Duque ◽  
Kelly Limi Aida ◽  
Jesse Augusto Pereira ◽  
Gláucia Schuindt Teixeira ◽  
Angela Scarparo Caldo-Teixeira ◽  
...  

1993 ◽  
Vol 38 (12) ◽  
pp. 1093-1098 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Murai ◽  
M. Ikeda ◽  
T. Yanagihara ◽  
G. Hara ◽  
K. Kato ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 327-331 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deepak Mehta ◽  
Rohit M Shetty ◽  
Sonia Bhat ◽  
G Srivatsa ◽  
Y Bharath Shetty

ABSTRACT Aim The aim of this clinical study was to compare the postoperative sensitivity of abutment teeth restored with full coverage restorations retained with either conventional glassionomer cement (GIC) or resin cement. Materials and methods Fifty patients received full-coverage restorations on vital abutment teeth. Of these, 25 were cemented with GIC (GC Luting and Lining cement) and the other 25 using an adhesive resin cement (Smartcem 2). A randomized single blind study was undertaken for acquiring and evaluating the data. The teeth were examined before cementation, after cementation, 24 hours postcementation and 7 days postcementation. A visual analog scale was used to help the patient rate hypersensitivity. Results The statistical analysis of the result was done using students paired t-test. No statistically significant difference between Smartcem 2 and GIC was observed, when tested immediately and 24 hours after cementation. Statistically significant difference was seen between Smartcem 2 and GIC when tested 7 days postcementation with a significance level of 0.05. Higher postoperative sensitivity was seen with GIC when compared to resin cement. Conclusion In this study, the incidence of postoperative hypersensitivity after cementation of full-crown restorations with GIC and resin cement was similar when tested immediately. However, 7 days postcementation, abutments with GIC showed higher response compared to resin cement. Clinical significance A self-adhesive resin cement can be the material of choice for luting if presence of postoperative sensitivity is of prime consideration. In case GIC is being used, patient should be informed about the presence of sensitivity for a more prolonged period than with resin cement. How to cite this article Shetty RM, Bhat S, Mehta D, Srivatsa G, Shetty YB. Comparative Analysis of Postcementation Hypersensitivity with Glass Ionomer Cement and a Resin Cement: An in vivo Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2012;13(3): 327-331.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document