Robot-assisted laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy: The university of Florence technique

2021 ◽  
Vol 79 ◽  
pp. S1812
Author(s):  
R. Campi ◽  
A. Pecoraro ◽  
F. Sessa ◽  
S. Morselli ◽  
L. Gemma ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sergio Serni ◽  
Alessio Pecoraro ◽  
Francesco Sessa ◽  
Luca Gemma ◽  
Isabella Greco ◽  
...  

Objective: To provide a step-by-step overview of the University of Florence technique for robotic living donor nephrectomy (LDN), focusing on its technical nuances and perioperative outcomes.Methods: A dedicated robotic LDN program at our Institution was codified in 2012. Data from patients undergoing robotic LDN from 2012 to 2019 were prospectively collected. All robotic LDNs were performed by a highly experienced surgeon, using the da Vinci Si robotic platform in a three-arm configuration. In this report we provide a detailed overview of our surgical technique for robotic LDN. The main objective of the study was to evaluate the technical feasibility and safety of the technique, including perioperative surgical complications rate and mid-term functional outcomes.Results: Overall, 36 patients undergoing robotic LDNs were included in the study. Of these, 28 (78%) were left LDNs. Median (IQR) donor pre-operative eGFR was 88 (75.6–90) ml/min/1.73 m2. In all cases, robotic LDN was completed without need of conversion. The median (IQR) overall operative time was 230 (195–258) min, while the median console time was 133 (IQR 117-166) min. The median (IQR) warm ischemia time was 175 (140–255) s. No intraoperative adverse events or 90-d major surgical complications were recorded. At a median (IQR) follow-up of 24 months (IQR 11-46), median (IQR) eGFR patients undergoing in living donor nephrectomy was 57.4 (47.9; 63.9) ml/min/1.73 m2.Conclusions: In our experience, robotic LDN is technically feasible and safe. The use of robotic surgery for LDN may provide distinct advantages for surgeons while ensuring optimal donors' perioperative and functional outcomes.


2020 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
pp. S41-S41
Author(s):  
Minh Sam Thai ◽  
Quy Thuan Chau ◽  
Khac Chuan Hoang ◽  
Xuan Thai Ngo ◽  
Trong Hien Nguyen ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 206 (Supplement 3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Riccardo Schiavina ◽  
Lorenzo Bianchi ◽  
Francesco Chessa ◽  
Marco Salvador ◽  
Laura Cercenelli ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 449-455 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giampaolo Siena ◽  
Graziano Vignolini ◽  
Andrea Mari ◽  
Vincenzo Li Marzi ◽  
Simone Caroassai ◽  
...  

Purpose. To describe our initial experience with a full robot-assisted approach for living donor nephrectomy (RALDN) and kidney transplantation (RAKT) in a dedicated twin operating room. Methods. From January to December 2017, 5 cases of RALDN and RAKT were performed in a single high-volume robotic center. All patients underwent a standard left RALDN. The renal hilum was controlled with Hem-O-Lok clips (WECK) and the kidney extracted through a Pfannenstiel incision. RAKT was performed according to the Vattikuti Urology Institute–Medanta technique. Results. RALDN: median estimated blood loss was 182 mL (range = 80-450 mL), no postoperative blood transfusion was required. The median (range) warm ischemia time was 175 (90-220 seconds). No conversion was registered. Median console time was 143 minutes (range = 115-220 minutes). No major surgical intraoperative and postoperative early and late complications occurred. RAKT: all 5 patients successfully underwent RAKT. Median (range) console time was 230 (190-200) minutes, vascular suture time was 58.7 (48-73) minutes, cold ischemia time was 46.2 (30-88) minutes, and rewarming time was 61.2 (55-72) minutes. No conversion was required. No major surgical intraoperative and postoperative early and late complications occurred. Mean glomerular filtration rate at days 1, 3, and 7 postoperatively was 26, 42, and 57 (range = 6-90) mL/min/1.73 m2, respectively. No case of delayed graft function was observed. No anastomosis revision, urological complications, lymphocele, and surgical site infection occurred. Conclusions. In our experience, RALDN and RAKT are safe and effective. The intuitiveness of the robotic approach provided substantial benefits both for the living donor and recipient from the very beginning of our series. No intraoperative and postoperative complications occurred.


Videourology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Riccardo Schiavina ◽  
Lorenzo Bianchi ◽  
Francesco Chessa ◽  
Marco Salvador ◽  
Laura Cercenelli ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document