Long-term results of provox voice prosthesis for voice rehabilitation after total laryngectomy “A seven years experience”

2003 ◽  
Vol 1240 ◽  
pp. 871-877
Author(s):  
A Tantawy
2005 ◽  
Vol 133 (1) ◽  
pp. 89-93 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlos T. Chone ◽  
Flávio M. Gripp ◽  
Ana L. Spina ◽  
Agricio N. Crespo

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the long-term use of indwelling Blom-Singer voice prosthesis (VP) for vocal rehabilitation of patients submitted to total laryngectomy (TL). The influence of the timing (primary or secondary) of tracheoesophageal puncture (TEP), use of radiotherapy (xRT), patient age, and length of follow-up were studied to evaluate the success rate of VP use. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: Prospective clinical study in a tertiary referral center. Seventy-one patients were submitted to TL and rehabilitated with indwelling VP. All patients were evaluated for vocal functional issues by an otolaryngologist and a speech pathologist at 1 month, then at every 3 months up to 1 year, and then at every 6 months after 1 year of follow-up. The relative data on time of placement of VP, time of VP use, xRT, age, length of follow-up, and life span of each VP were recorded during the follow-up. RESULTS: Eighty-seven percent of the patients underwent primary and 13%, secondary TEP. The follow-up varied from 12 to 87 months, with an average of 38 months for primary and 51 months for secondary TEP. Fifty-nine percent of the patients were submitted to xRT. The general rate of success was 94%, with 97% for primary and 78% ( P = 0.07) for secondary TEP; after 2 years, the success rate was 96% for primary and 75% for secondary ( P = 0.07) TEP. The use of xRT and patient age had no influence on the success of VP use for primary and secondary TEP, independently of the length of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The success rate of voice rehabilitation with VP was 94%. In primary TEP, the success rate was 97%, whereas in secondary TEP it was 78%; 2 years later, it was 96% and 75%, respectively. A tendency for a higher success rate in voice rehabilitation after TL was observed in primary TEP. The use of xRT and age of patient had no influence on the success rate.


2009 ◽  
Vol 60 (1) ◽  
pp. 16-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takashi Nasu ◽  
Shuji Koike ◽  
Daisuke Noda ◽  
Yoshihiro Onoe ◽  
Masaru Aoyagi

2005 ◽  
Vol 71 (4) ◽  
pp. 504-509 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlos Takahiro Chone ◽  
Ana L. Spina ◽  
Agricio N. Crespo ◽  
Flavio M. Gripp

Author(s):  
Mafalda Martins de Sousa ◽  
Ricardo Matos ◽  
Helena Vilarinho ◽  
Margarida Santos ◽  
Helena Silveira

2010 ◽  
Vol 113 (11) ◽  
pp. 838-843
Author(s):  
Tomonori Terada ◽  
Nobuo Saeki ◽  
Nobuhiro Uwa ◽  
Kosuke Sagawa ◽  
Takeshi Mohri ◽  
...  

1997 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 94-98 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simon Hon Wai Wong ◽  
Anthony Po Wing Yuen ◽  
Catherine Cheung ◽  
William Ignace Wei ◽  
Lai Kun Lam

2021 ◽  
pp. 019459982098334
Author(s):  
Claudio Parrilla ◽  
Ylenia Longobardi ◽  
Jacopo Galli ◽  
Mario Rigante ◽  
Gaetano Paludetti ◽  
...  

Objective Periprosthetic leakage represents the most demanding long-term complication in the voice prosthesis rehabilitation. The aim of this article is to discuss the various causes of periprosthetic leakage and to propose a systematic management algorithm. Study Design Retrospective cohort study. Setting Otolaryngology clinic of the University Polyclinic A. Gemelli–IRCCS Foundation. Methods The study included 115 patients with voice prosthesis who were treated from December 2014 to December 2019. All patients who experienced periprosthetic leakage were treated with the same step-by-step therapeutic approach until it was successful. Incidence, management, and success rate of every attempt are analyzed and discussed. Results Periprosthetic leakage was reported 330 times by 82 patients in 1374 clinic accesses. Radiotherapy, timing of tracheoesophageal puncture, and type of total laryngectomy (primary or salvage) did not influence the incidence of periprosthetic leakage. Salvage total laryngectomy increases the risk of more clinically relevant leakages. Conclusion By using a systematic algorithm with a step-by-step standardized approach, periprosthetic leakage management could become a less treacherous issue.


1993 ◽  
Vol 14 (6) ◽  
pp. 419-425 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michel Zanaret ◽  
Antoine Giovanni ◽  
Régis Gras ◽  
Maurice Cannoni

1999 ◽  
Vol 113 (6) ◽  
pp. 532-537 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. G. Lallemant ◽  
P. Bonnin ◽  
I. El-Sioufi ◽  
J. Bousquet

AbstractNear total laryngectomy with cricohyoepiglottopexy (CHEP) allows cure of glottic carcinomas with voice preservation. The subject of this study was to evaluate CHEP in terms of tumour control and functional result in T1 and T2 glottic carcinomas.This study reviewed retrospectively 55 consecutive cases of CHEP performed between January 1, 1981 and September 1, 1992 with the exclusion of post-radiotherapy salvage surgery. CHEP was indicated for a T1a limit to the anterior commissure and/or with dysplasia of the other vocal fold (10 cases), T1b (11 cases) and T2 (34 cases) glottic carcinomas. All our patients have a follow-up of more than five years.The post-operative course after this surgery was generally uneventful. The median time to decannulation was 18 days, to removal of the nasogastric tube was 15 days and to discharge from hospital was 23 days. No significant difference was observed according to the preservation of one or both arytenoid cartilages. The long-term functional result can be considered to be good in three-quarters of cases, with normal oral swallowing and an easily understood voice. The remaining one quarter had a whispery voice and sometimes episodes of aspiration when swallowing liquids. In terms of oncological results, the five-year recurrence-free survival rate was 94 per cent for T1 and 84 per cent for T2. The ultimate tumour control (taking into account four cases of total laryngectomy) was 94 per cent for T1 and 93 per cent for T2.Primary surgery by CHEP therefore appears to be a good option for early glottic carcinomas. The main problem remains that voice recovery is mediocre in one quarter of patients.


2003 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 1093-1100 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroyuki Yamada ◽  
Shin-ichiro Nishii ◽  
Shigetoshi Sakabe ◽  
Ryoji Ishida

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document