Superficial femoral artery autograft reconstruction in the treatment of popliteal artery aneurysm: Long-term outcome

2009 ◽  
Vol 2009 ◽  
pp. 312-313
Author(s):  
G.L. Moneta
2008 ◽  
Vol 48 (2) ◽  
pp. 311-316 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nikolaos Paraskevas ◽  
Yves Castier ◽  
Sumio Fukui ◽  
Patrick Soury ◽  
Gabriel Thabut ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 24 (7) ◽  
pp. 871-875 ◽  
Author(s):  
Enjae Jung ◽  
Jeffrey Jim ◽  
Brian G. Rubin ◽  
Luis A. Sanchez ◽  
Eric T. Choi ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 37 (4) ◽  
pp. 914-919 ◽  
Author(s):  
John H. Saunders ◽  
Said Abisi ◽  
Nishath Altaf ◽  
Yao Yong ◽  
Shane T. MacSweeney ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 67 (6) ◽  
pp. 1797-1804 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bahar Golchehr ◽  
Clark J. Zeebregts ◽  
Michel M.P.J. Reijnen ◽  
Ignace F.J. Tielliu

2020 ◽  
Vol 99 (8) ◽  

Introduction: The indications for popliteal artery aneurysm treatment are clear. In aneurysms with patent inflow and outflow arteries, the risk of peripheral embolisation from a mural thrombus is high and the treatment, mostly a vascular intervention, is focused on preventing this extremity- threatening complication. It is unclear, however, how high the risk of peripheral embolisation is and how to proceed with a patent popliteal artery aneurysm fed by the deep femoral artery when the superficial femoral artery is chronically occluded. Methods: All patients diagnosed with popliteal artery aneurysm between 2015 and 2019 were searched in the database of the Department of Surgery II of University Hospital Olomouc. Patients with a patent popliteal artery aneurysm and chronic superficial femoral artery occlusion in the ipsilateral extremity were selected. Results: We diagnosed 66 patients with 85 popliteal artery aneurysms. Four patients had a patent popliteal artery aneurysm and chronic superficial femoral artery occlusion in the ipsilateral extremity. In these patients, conservative treatment was indicated after the diagnosis was determined. In three patients, no clinically obvious complication of the popliteal artery aneurysm occurred. In one patient, popliteal artery aneurysm thrombosis occurred after a follow-up of 21 months, leading to a shortening of his calf claudication distance and limiting the patient. Conclusion: Our experience with this small group of patients shows the possibility of primary conservative treatment in patients with a patent popliteal artery aneurysm below the chronic superficial femoral artery occlusion site. Aneurysm thrombosis can be expected during follow-up. Patients in whom the thrombosis leads to limitations are indicated for surgical intervention. The risk of peripheral embolisation from the mural thrombus cannot be excluded with certainty. Further studies involving large groups of patients are needed to provide a more precise recommendation.


2008 ◽  
Vol 72 (5) ◽  
pp. 734-739 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chizuko Kamiya ◽  
Shingo Sakamoto ◽  
Yuiichi Tamori ◽  
Tsuyoshi Yoshimuta ◽  
Masahiro Higashi ◽  
...  

Vascular ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 170853812110195
Author(s):  
Nikita Singh ◽  
Ronak Patel ◽  
Anil Hingorani ◽  
Enrico Ascher

Background Several veins have been well-recognized as acceptable conduits for infrainguinal bypass surgery when the ipsilateral greater saphenous vein is unavailable. However, there is a paucity of literature describing the brachial vein as an adequate alternative. In the absence of other viable autogenous conduits, we describe the use of a brachial vein as a successful alternative for lower extremity revascularization. Methods A 70-year-old man presented with a chief complaint of right calf pain. Duplex ultrasound imaging of his right lower extremity revealed right-sided 2.5 cm acutely thrombosed superficial femoral artery and popliteal artery aneurysms. The patient underwent a suction thrombectomy with tissue plasminogen activator using the Power Pulse feature and Solent catheter from the AngioJet® (Boston-Scientific, Marlborough, MA) system. To repair the thrombosed aneurysms, an open bypass was planned. Due to lack of viable alternative traditionally used venous conduits, a bypass was created using the patient’s brachial vein. Results A bypass was created from the superficial femoral artery to the P2 segment of the popliteal artery using a non-reversed brachial vein with ligation of the side branches of the superficial femoral artery and popliteal artery aneurysm from within the sac lumen. Completion angiogram revealed runoff through the anterior tibial artery only. Follow-up imaging at three months demonstrated a patent brachial bypass. Conclusion Brachial veins can be safely used as viable venous conduits for lower extremity bypass surgery and should therefore be considered as an alternative when more commonly used veins are unsuitable or unavailable. However, more research is needed to determine the potential opportunities and challenges this alternative may present.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document