A new technique of congenital cataract surgery with primary posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation

1988 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 149-157 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronald T. Tablante ◽  
Edward Dennis G. Cruz ◽  
Jaime V. Lapus ◽  
Alvin M. Santos
2017 ◽  
Vol 46 (0) ◽  
pp. 155-159
Author(s):  
Miyuki Kobayashi ◽  
Erina Koide ◽  
Fumiko Hori ◽  
Naoko Yamaguchi ◽  
Hiroko Kakihara

ISRN Surgery ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-4
Author(s):  
Muhammad Waseem ◽  
Sadia Humayun ◽  
Omer Farooq ◽  
Quratulain Humayun ◽  
Sana Sadiq Sheikh

Objective. To compare patient’s satisfaction level in performing routine activities during daylight and night vision after implantation with rigid, foldable, or rollable posterior chamber intraocular lens implants in uneventful cataract surgery. Design. Retrospective, cross-sectional. Place and Duration of Study. PNS SHIFA Hospital, Karachi, from Nov. 2009 to Nov. 2010. Methodology. 91 cataract surgery patients who had uneventful phacoemulsification, within the bag placement of intraocular lens and achieved best corrected visual acuity 6/9 or better were included in the study. Patients who developed postoperative complications were excluded. A specially designed questionnaire was used to assess patient’s satisfaction level of vision for those who underwent cataract surgery at least 3 months ago. Finally, they were categorized into five groups ranging from “very good” to “very poor.” SPSS version 16 was used to analyze the results. Results. There was a difference in satisfaction level between three groups. Vision was good in the day and the night with foldable posterior chamber intraocular lens implants. Conclusion. It was concluded that visual satisfaction level of patients who had foldable posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation was better during the day and night as compared to patients who had rigid or rollable posterior chamber intraocular lenses implantation.


2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 465-468 ◽  
Author(s):  
Piotr Kanclerz ◽  
Andrzej Grzybowski ◽  
Stephen G Schwartz ◽  
Paweł Lipowski

Introduction: The aim of the study was to evaluate complications of cataract surgery in eyes filled with silicone oil. Methods: This retrospective, noncomparative, consecutive case series analyzed medical files of patients with eyes filled with silicone oil undergoing cataract surgery. Phacoemulsification with posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation was conducted with or without concurrent silicone oil removal. Results: In this study, 121 eyes of 120 patients were included. In 32 eyes (26.4%) with evident silicone oil microemulsification or silicone oil–associated open-angle glaucoma, silicone oil was removed prior to phacoemulsification through a pars plana incision and no cases of posterior capsular rupture occurred during the subsequent cataract surgery. In the remaining 89 eyes, phacoemulsification was performed with silicone oil in the vitreous cavity. In these eyes, the rate of posterior capsular rupture was 9/89 (10.1%) and the rate of silicone oil migration into the anterior chamber through an apparently intact posterior capsule was 5/89 (5.6%). In 94 eyes (77.7%), an intraocular lens was inserted into the capsular bag, in 3 eyes (2.5%) into the sulcus, and in 1 eye (0.8%) a transscleral suturing was performed. Conclusions: In this series, complications related to the silicone oil were not uncommon during cataract surgery. In the majority of patients without evident silicone oil microemulsification or silicone oil–associated open-angle glaucoma, cataract surgery and posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation were performed while leaving the silicone oil in place.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document