Rotational stability and clinical outcomes of a new one piece toric intraocular lens with anchor-wing haptics

Background To evaluate the safety and efficacy of a new toric intraocular lens (IOL) with anchor-wing haptics. Methods The new toric IOL with anchor-wing haptics (NS60YT, NIDEK Co., Ltd.) was implanted in eligible patients with age-related cataracts with preoperative corneal astigmatism of 1.0 D or greater at a university hospital and two private hospitals in Japan. The following IOL cylinder powers were evaluated: 1.50 D (NS60YT3), 2.25 D (NS60YT4), 3.00 D (NS60YT5) and 4.50 D (NS60YT7). All patients were assessed out to 12 months postoperatively. The primary endpoint was visual acuity (VA) with spherical addition at 6 months postoperatively, and the primary analysis calculated the proportion of eyes with VA with spherical addition of 0.1 logMAR or better. The magnitude of rotation was compared to the intended axis of IOL implantation at each postoperative examination. Adverse events were evaluated for the safety analysis. Results This study enrolled 64 eyes of 53 patients. At 6 months postoperatively, for all IOL powers, VA with spherical addition of 0.1 logMAR or better was achieved in 90% [95% confidence interval (CI): 80–96] of eyes. The mean IOL rotation was 5.3 ± 4.3° at 12 months postoperatively. The mean magnitude of rotation ranged from 1.9° to 2.5° between each postoperative examination from 1 day to 12 months. There were no vision-threatening intraoperative or postoperative complications for the duration of the study. Conclusions The NS60YT IOL remained stable after implantation and was efficacious for treating 1.00 D or greater astigmatism in patients with senile cataracts. Trial registration This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03242486) on August 8, 2017 - Retrospectively registered.

Prediction Error Stabilization and Long-Term Standard Results with a Monofocal Intraocular Lens

The aim of this study was to assess the stability and differences between objective (O-Rx) and subjective (S-Rx) refraction for the assessment of the prediction error (PE). A secondary aim was to report the results of a monofocal intraocular lens (IOL). 100 subjects were included for whom S-Rx and O-Rx were obtained for all visits, and for visual performance, posterior capsular opacification incidence and Nd:YAG rates at 12 months. Either S-Rx and O-Rx showed a hyperopic shift from 1 to 6 months (p < 0.05) and stabilization after 6 months. S-Rx was related with the axial length (rho = −0.29, p = 0.007), obtaining a major tendency towards hyperopia in short eyes implanted with high-power IOLs. O-Rx showed a myopic shift in comparison to S-Rx (p < 0.05). This resulted in a decrease of the number of eyes in ±0.50 D and ±1.00 D from 79 to 67% and from 94 to 90%, respectively. The median (interquartile range) uncorrected and corrected visual acuities were 0.1 (0.29) and 0 (0.12) logMAR, respectively, and seven eyes required Nd:YAG capsulotomy at 12 months. Some caution should be taken in PE studies in which O-Rx is used or S-Rx is measured in a 1-month follow-up. Constant optimization should be conducted for this IOL after S-Rx stabilization.

Longitudinal Evaluation of Trifocal and Extended Depth of Focus Lenses Implantation using Standard Automated Perimetry Parameters

Purpose: To evaluate reliability and global indices parameters from standard automated perimetry (SAP) in normal eyes undergoing phacoemulsification cataract surgery with implantation of trifocal or extended depth of focus intraocular lens (IOL).Methods: Prospective comparative study. Comparison of trifocal IOL AcrySof IQ PanOptix® and extended depth of focus intraocular lens (EDOF) Tecnis Symfony® IOL. Patients underwent SAP pre- and postoperatively. Reliability indices (false negative rate - FN, false positive rate – FP), global indices (foveal sensitivity threshold, visual field index - VFI, standard pattern deviation – PSD, mean deviation MD) and test duration were analyzed.Results: A total of 23 eyes from 13 patients were in the trifocal IOL group and a total of 22 eyes from 14 patients were in the EDOF group The following results were obtained by analyzing pre- and postoperative SAP of EDOF IOL: the rate of change of FN was 1.95/1.41% (p=0.61); FP 1.64/1.27 (p=0.60); MD -1.60/-1.08dB (p=0.15); foveal sensitivity was 34.5/33.9dB (p=0.41); VFI 98.5/98.4% (p>0.99); PSD 1.85/1.86 (p=0.07); and for test duration 305.81/298.36s (p=0.35); all respectively. Analysis of pre- and postoperative parameters of trifocal IOL was: the rates of change of FN 1.22/1.83% (p=0.29); FP 1.65/1.48% (p=0.95); MD -1.55/-1.37dB (p=0.19) ; foveal sensitivity 33.9/34.9dB (p=0.47) ; VFI 98.6/98.3% (p=0.62); PSD 1.58/2.05 (p=0.02); and test duration 297.17/298.57s (p=0.87); all respectively. Conclusion: We identified a change in the PSD parameters in the trifocal IOL group. No other significant changes were identified in SAP parameters after implantation of trifocal AcrySof IQ PanOptix® and EDOF Tecnis Symfony® IOL. Longitudinal evaluation showed no changes in SAP after Trifocal and EDOF IOL implantation in normal subjects.

Bilateral phacoemulsification of cataract: the opinion of foreign ophthalmologists

Рurpose: to present the opinion of foreign ophthalmic surgeons on simultaneous bilateral phacoemulsification of cataract (SBPEC) by analyzing literature data. We performed an analysis of papers listed by Pubmed in 2000–2020 which contained expert assessments of SBPEC effectiveness based on polling. Ophthalmic surgeons were offered special questionnaires largely close in content, which were designed to establish the rating of factors that affected the respondents’ decision for or against the surgery. Our results indicate that, depending on the country, from 13.9 to 86 % of ophthalmic surgeons practice SBPEC, while from 14.0 to 67.2 % refrain from using this technology. The surveys revealed three major factors in favor of SBPEC — reduced number of clinical visits, the patient’s convenience during rehabilitation, and a high risk of complications after a second general anesthesia. The main factors against SBPEC are the risk of endophthalmitis (noted by 69–73 % of respondents), the absence of information on the postoperative refractive result in the first eye, which could determine the choice of the intraocular lens on the second eye (74–80 %), the risk of bilateral vision loss (73–79 %), as well as possible forensic problems (52–58 %).Conclusion. The surveying highlights certain negative factors that need to be overcome in order for SBPEC to become more widespread. Raising the awareness of SBPEC practice and approval by the ophthalmic community is essential for a sustainable culture change regarding this technology. To achieve this aim, standardization of the SBPEC procedure is needed, followed by the development of training manuals and protocols for surgical intervention.