Hepatic and peripheral glucose metabolism in intensive care patients receiving continuous high — or low — carbohydrate enteral nutrition

2000 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 168-169
Author(s):  
C. Chambrier
1999 ◽  
Vol 23 (5) ◽  
pp. 260-268 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luc Tappy ◽  
Mette Berger ◽  
Jean-Marc Schwarz ◽  
Mark McCamish ◽  
Jean-Pierre Revelly ◽  
...  

1995 ◽  
Vol 108 (4) ◽  
pp. A745
Author(s):  
C. Pehl ◽  
A. Pfeiffer ◽  
O. Kuntzen ◽  
B. Melzner ◽  
H. Kaess

2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 64-69 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kellie Jones ◽  
Pinckney J. Maxwell ◽  
Stephen McClave ◽  
Karen Allen

Author(s):  
Rosa Aguilera-Martinez ◽  
Emilia Ramis-Ortega ◽  
Concha Carratalá-Munuera. ◽  
José Manuel Fernández-Medina ◽  
M Dolores Saiz-Vinuesa ◽  
...  

1999 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 47-56 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Jolliet ◽  
C. Pichard ◽  
G. Biolo ◽  
R. Chioléro ◽  
G. Grimble ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 37 (2) ◽  
pp. e15-e23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Colleen O’Leary-Kelley ◽  
Karen Bawel-Brinkley

In critical care, malnutrition has a significant, negative impact on a patient’s ability to respond to medical treatment. Enteral nutrition is known to counteract the metabolic changes associated with critical illness that increase the risk for serious complications and poor clinical outcomes. Inadequate delivery of nutrition support and underfeeding persist in intensive care units despite the availability of guidelines and current research for best practice. Recent studies have shown that nutrition support protocols are effective in promoting nutritional goals in a wide variety of intensive care patients. It is essential to find approaches that enhance early delivery of enteral nutrition that meets requirements and supports improved outcomes. Nurses are in a unique position to take an active role in promoting the best nutritional outcomes for their patients by using and evaluating nutrition support protocols.


2021 ◽  
Vol 26 (6) ◽  
pp. 632-637
Author(s):  
Amber G. Fessler ◽  
Catherine E. Rejrat

OBJECTIVE To reach nutrition goals for neonatal patients, institutions often exceed the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition recommended maximum of 900 mOsm/L for peripheral parenteral nutrition (PPN). Evidence is limited regarding the safety of PPN osmolarities above this maximum, specifically in neonatal patients. The purpose of this study was to determine if PPN with osmolarities ≥ 1000 mOsm/L is associated with an increased rate of line-related complications. METHODS This retrospective study included infants admitted to the Penn State Health Children's Hospital NICU from January 1, 2013, through July 31, 2018, who were receiving PPN, to assess if solutions with osmolarities ≥ 1000 mOsm/L versus < 1000 mOsm/L are associated with increased rates of line-related complications. RESULTS A total of 200 patients were included in the study, and 618 individual PPN days were analyzed. Baseline patient characteristics were similar between groups. The PPN osmolarities ranged from 610 to 1267 mOsm/L. Overall, the incidence of line-related complications for PPN < 1000 (n = 342 PPN days) and ≥ 1000 mOsm/L (n = 276 PPN days) was 28.9% and 29.0%, respectively (OR 1.00 [95% CI 0.72–1.40, p = 0.99]). Irrespective of PPN osmolarity, infants weighing > 1.5 kg had significantly greater odds of experiencing line complications compared with patients < 1 kg, but showed no difference compared with patients weighing 1 to 1.5 kg. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS There were no significant differences in the incidence of line-related complications in NICU patients receiving PPN with osmolarities 1000 to 1250 versus < 1000 mOsm/L.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document