Open Versus Closed Reduction of Mandible Fractures

1998 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 541-565
Author(s):  
Bertrand Sorel
Keyword(s):  
Closed Reduction ◽  
Mandible Fractures ◽  
Open Versus

scholarly journals Open Versus Closed Treatment Of Subcondyle Mandible Fracture: An Evidence-Based Case Report

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 151-159
Author(s):  
Kristaninta Bangun ◽  
Irinawati Nangingtuari ◽  
Andria Olivia ◽  
Muhammad Iqbal Maulana
Keyword(s):  
Facial Nerve ◽  
Closed Reduction ◽  
Open Reduction ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Case Review ◽  
Literature Study ◽  
Facial Surgery ◽  
Closed Treatment ◽  
Mandible Fractures ◽  
Open Versus

Background : Mandibular subcondyle fractures are accounted for 25%-35% of all mandible fractures. Closed treatment has been the preferred treatment for several years because it’s relatively easier and non invasive but the complications that may arise are varied. Open reduction was one of the options that is considered to reduce complications. This study examines whether open reduction was a better choice than closed reduction in the management of mandible subcondyle fracture with parameter outcomes are complications, facial nerve injury, pain, and mouth occlusion. Method: A literature study was conducted from two databases: PubMed and Journal of Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery (JOMS) with predefined keywords and references from 23-28 January 2018. The search was conducted with mandible subcondyle fracture, open reduction, and closed reduction. The search has been limited only for the last 5 years and limited to meta-analysis and systematic review. From the search, there were three articles used based on inclusion criteria in this case review. Result: The reviewed articles showed that open reduction provides better results than closed reduction, although open reduction results in complications of facial injuries and facial nerve weakness, but the complications were transient and tolerable.Conclusion: Based on existing clinical evidence, open reduction was the preferred management rather than closed. reduction due to better outcome and fewer complication.

A Comparison of Complications and Union Rates in Intramedullary Nailing of Femoral Shaft Fractures Treated With Open Versus Closed Reduction

Orthopedics ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 43 (2) ◽  
pp. 103-107
Author(s):  
Zachary L. Telgheder ◽  
Matthew A. Albanese ◽  
David S. Bloom ◽  
Swamy Kurra ◽  
Matthew P. Sullivan
Keyword(s):  
Intramedullary Nailing ◽  
Closed Reduction ◽  
Femoral Shaft ◽  
Femoral Shaft Fractures ◽  
Shaft Fractures ◽  
Open Versus

Mandible Fractures

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
John J. Chi ◽  
Emily Konkus
Keyword(s):  
Closed Reduction ◽  
Open Reduction ◽  
Penetrating Trauma ◽  
Mandibular Fracture ◽  
Facial Fractures ◽  
Surgical Interventions ◽  
Maxillomandibular Fixation ◽  
Mandible Fracture ◽  
Fracture Management ◽  
Mandible Fractures

Mandible fractures are often caused by blunt or penetrating trauma and are one of the most common facial fractures. It is critical to understand facial and mandibular anatomy to best evaluate, classify, and treat mandible fractures. The primary goal of treatment is to restore the jaw to the preinjury occlusion. This can be achieved through open reduction with internal fixation or closed reduction with maxillomandibular fixation (MMF) in conjunction with dietary changes and/or physiotherapy. The main risks and concerns in mandible fracture management are infection, malunion, airway compromise, pain, and temporomandibular joint (TMJ) dysfunction. This chapter will provide a brief overview of facial and mandibular anatomy as well as common treatment methods and surgical interventions.  This review contains 17 figures, 2 tables, and 43 references Key words: Mandibular fracture, maxillomandibular fixation, occlusion, malunion, closed reduction, open reduction, TMJ dysfunction

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document