EARLY OUTCOMES OF FLEXIBLE INTRAMEDULLARY NAILING IN PEDIATRIC SHAFT OF FEMUR FRACTURES

Objective: To study the early outcomes and complications of fixation of pediatric shaft of femur fractures using flexible intramedullary nail. Study Design: Prospective observational study. Place and Duration of Study: Orthopedic Department, Bahawal Victoria Hospital Bahawalpur, from Jan to Jun 2021. Methodology: Children between the ages of 5-11 years with shaft of femur fractures were included in the study. Fixation of fracture was done using elastic intramedullary nail. Final outcomes of fixation were observed using Flynn and Schwend Scoring System. Six-month follow-up was done in all cases. Data was analyzed using SPSS-20. Results: Total 70 cases having shaft of femur fracture were included in the study. Age range of cases was 5-11 years with mean age of 7.75 ± 1.66 years and mean weight of 24.44 ± 4.77 kilograms. Mean diameter of femur medullary canal was 7.48 ± 0.63 millimeters and mean diameter of flexible nail was 3.03 ± 0.26 millimeters. Mean post-operative period of radiological union of fracture was 8.57 ± 1.05 weeks. Per-operatively, fracture site was approached in 4 (5.7%) cases. Migration of nail was not seen in any case. Final outcomes according to Flynn and Shwend Score were excellent in 62 (88.5%), satisfactory in 7 (10%) and poor in 1 (1.4%) case. Conclusion: Fixation of shaft of femur fracture using flexible intramedullary nailing technique is safe and reliable with good outcomes among children between 5-11 years of age.

Treatment outcomes in humeral fractures of different location (review)

The choice of treatment (open reduction and internal fixation) for a humeral fracture with a plate versus an intramedullary nail is highly debated. We compared outcomes (fracture union, reoperation, and adverse events) of intramedullary nailing and plate fixation in patients with proximal humeral, humeral shaft, and distal humeral fractures. No significant differences were found between intramedullary nailing and plate fixation for fracture union, reoperation, or adverse events in patients with proximal humeral or humeral shaft fractures. There is a scarcity of evidence comparing intramedullary nailing and plating for distal humeral fractures. No recommendations can be given from current evidence. Surgeons may have to continue to use discretion based on their personal preference, experience as well as patient’s characteristics and fracture features before more high-quality evidence is available.

Classification of Proximal Tibial Fractures and Algorithm of Intramedullary Nailing: Efficacy Evaluation

Background. Intramedullary nailing of proximal tibial fractures is challenging due to difficulties with fracture reduction and achievement of stable fixation. Preoperative planning based on proximal fragment length, fracture pattern and bone quality evaluation is a prerequisite for a successful operation. However, there is no classification that could adequately access these factors and guide us towards the most effective methods of fracture reduction and fixation with intramedullary nail. The purpose of this study was to evaluate a classification of extra-articular proximal tibial fractures and algorithm for intramedullary nailing in clinical conditions. Materials and Methods. We compared the treatment outcomes before (Group 1) and after (Group 2) the introduction of the new PFL-TN classification algorithm of intramedullary nailing of proxamal tibial fractures. The group 1 included 43 patients from 18 to 71 years old (males 28; females 15; average age 44.52.0 years). The group 2 included 42 patients from 18 to 72 years old (males 30; females 12; average age 46.12.0 years). The data analysis was carried out after a minimum follow-up period of 12 months. The results were analyzed by the following criteria: reduction quality assesed with reduction quality scale, number of complications, quality of life with SF-36 questionnaire and leg function with LEFS scale. Results. The introduction of the proposed algorithm allowed to reduce the number of late complications by more than 5 times, and the number of required additional surgical interventions by more than 4 times compared to with a control group. The introduction of the proposed algorithm made it possible to improve the functional outcomes 1 year after surgery from 83.58 to 93.29% (p = 0.00002) by the LEFS scale, and the patients quality of life from the 77.501.88 to 86.712.03 points (p = 0.00072) and from the 81.251.88 to 86.842.26 points (p = 0.00116) by the physical and role functioning scales SF-36 questionnaire. Conclusion. The proposed algorithm, based on the new classification, allows to optimize the surgical technique of intramedullary nailing of proximal tibial fractures.

Prognostic factors for surgical site infection following intramedullary nailing of diaphyseal fractures of the femur and tibia in adult patients at a tertiary hospital in Lusaka, Zambia

Our study aimed to identify prognostic factors for surgical site infection following long bone fracture intramedullary nailing at a tertiary hospital in a low-resource setting. This was a longitudinal observational study involving 132 participants enrolled over a one-year period with femoral and tibial diaphyseal fractures scheduled for ORIF. Participant median age was 30 years (range: 26 – 42). The prevalence of surgical site infection was 16%. Male sex (AOR=0.26, 95% CI [0.70–0.98]; p = 0.047) was associated with lower odds of surgical site infection while associated non-musculoskeletal injuries were associated with higher odds of developing surgical site infection. Our study confirms a higher surgical site infection rate than normally accepted. However, intramedullary nailing in our setting is justified as it allows an early return to a pre-injury state. These interventions must be carried out in the best possible circumstances. Future studies could explore alternative methods of fracture fixation.

Treatment of FRI after intramedullary nailing of tibia fractures: assessment of nail retention and nail removal

Objectives: Fracture related infection (FRI) is a severe, potentially limb-threatening complication after fracture fixation. Dilemma exists with regard to removing or retaining implants while treating the infection. The purpose of this study was to compare primary bone union and infection clearance in patients who had an infection following intramedullary nailing of the tibia treated either by retaining the implant or by removing the implant. Methods: Patients from two level-I trauma centers were identified through billing registries and retrospectively reviewed between January 2013 and December 2020. We identified 44 patients who had a diagnosis of FRI within 90 days of their initial fixation and returned to the OR for operative treatment of the infection. The incidences of both primary union and infection clearance were calculated for both groups and multiple parameters that may be associated with success or failure were assessed. Results: Four patients did not have complete records and were excluded. Of the remaining patients, 20 (50%) achieved infection clearance. Twenty-three (59%) patients achieved primary union whereas 16 (41%) had a primary outcome of either delayed union, nonunion, or amputation (one additional patient excluded as healing status unknown). Further analysis showed no significant difference (X2 (39) = 1.13, p < .29) in infection clearance between patients treated with nail retention (64%) versus nail removal (68%). No significant difference was seen in primary bone union (X2 (39) = 3.24, p < .07) with 36% of patients treated with nail retention and 68% of patients treated with nail removal reaching primary union; however, this does trend toward an association. Fewer surgeries performed for infection and complication after initial fixation was positively associated with infection clearance (p < .04, M=4.6, SD=2.13, df=39) and primary union (p < .001, M=4, SD=2, df=38). Conclusion: Infection clearance seems similarly possible with both nail retention and nail removal strategies, with fewer number of surgeries performed for infection and complication improving the likelihood of infection clearance and bone union. This may suggest that more severe FRI’s are less likely to unite and clear infection. Nail removal may play a role in increasing primary bone union; however, a larger sample size is needed for more definitive assessment.