1–32 Screening Mammograms: Interpretation with Computer-aided Detection—Prospective Evaluation

2007 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 62-63
Author(s):  
T.E. Cupples
Radiology ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 239 (2) ◽  
pp. 375-383 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marilyn J. Morton ◽  
Dana H. Whaley ◽  
Kathleen R. Brandt ◽  
Kimberly K. Amrami

Radiology ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 232 (2) ◽  
pp. 578-584 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stamatia V. Destounis ◽  
Patricia DiNitto ◽  
Wende Logan-Young ◽  
Ermelinda Bonaccio ◽  
Margarita L. Zuley ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 2008 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ikhlas Abdel-Qader ◽  
Fadi Abu-Amara

Screening mammograms is a repetitive task that causes fatigue and eye strain since for every thousand cases analyzed by a radiologist, only 3–4 are cancerous and thus an abnormality may be overlooked. Computer-aided detection (CAD) algorithms were developed to assist radiologists in detecting mammographic lesions. In this paper, a computer-aided detection and diagnosis (CADD) system for breast cancer is developed. The framework is based on combining principal component analysis (PCA), independent component analysis (ICA), and a fuzzy classifier to identify and label suspicious regions. This is a novel approach since it uses a fuzzy classifier integrated into the ICA model. Implemented and tested using MIAS database. This algorithm results in the classification of a mammogram as either normal or abnormal. Furthermore, if abnormal, it differentiates it into a benign or a malignant tissue. Results show that this system has 84.03% accuracy in detecting all kinds of abnormalities and 78% diagnosis accuracy.


2007 ◽  
Vol 188 (2) ◽  
pp. 377-384 ◽  
Author(s):  
Per Skaane ◽  
Ashwini Kshirsagar ◽  
Sandra Stapleton ◽  
Kari Young ◽  
Ronald A. Castellino

Radiology ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 241 (1) ◽  
pp. 47-53 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fiona J. Gilbert ◽  
Susan M. Astley ◽  
Magnus A. McGee ◽  
Maureen G. C. Gillan ◽  
Caroline R. M. Boggis ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document