Technique of external fixation ofgrossly unstable or open tibial shaft fractures in children

1995 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 157-163
Author(s):  
Steven L. Buckley
JBJS Reviews ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. e4-e4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeremy E. Raducha ◽  
Ishaan Swarup ◽  
Jonathan M. Schachne ◽  
Aristides I. Cruz ◽  
Peter D. Fabricant

2004 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 384
Author(s):  
Phil Hyun Chung ◽  
Chung Soo Hwang ◽  
Suk Kang ◽  
Jong Pil Kim ◽  
Ho Jun Cheon

2005 ◽  
Vol 62 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sasa Milenkovic ◽  
Milorad Mitkovic ◽  
Mile Radenkovic

Aim. To present the possibility of a successful use of external skeletal fixation in treating the open and closed tibial shaft fractures with Mitkovic?s external fixator. Methods. External fixation was used in 115 patients with 118 fresh tibial shaft fractures, 82 males (71.3%) and 33 females (28.7%), average age 43.92 years (16?84). Open tibial shaft fractures were present in 37 (31.36%). All the fractures were treated with Mitkovic?s external fixator type M 20. Results. The results of external fixation were excellent or good in 94.07% of the cases, and bad in 5.08%. Pin tract infection appeared in 7 (5.93%) patients. In only 3 cases an external fixator was removed and treatment continued with the functional braces. Nonunion occurred in 6 (5.08%) patients, of which 4 were with open fractures (2 Gustilo type IIIB, 1 Gustilo type IIIA, 1 Gustilo type II) and 2 with the segment fractures. Compartment syndrome was observed in 1 (0.85%) patient with closed fracture. Malunion was found in 2 (1.69%) patients. Conclusion. External fixation of tibial shaft fractures is a simple and effective method to enable the safe healing of fractures, early mobilization of the patients, early weight-bearing, as well as early rehabilitation. Fixation of tibial shaft fractures was unilateral with convergent pins orientation, and there was also a possibility of compression and distraction.


1998 ◽  
Vol 33 (4) ◽  
pp. 1170
Author(s):  
Chung Nam Kang ◽  
Jin Man Wang ◽  
Kwon Jae Roh ◽  
Jong Oh Kim ◽  
Dong Jun Kim ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 84 (1) ◽  
pp. 1984-1988
Author(s):  
Amr Mohamed Eladawy ◽  
Riad Mansour Megahed ◽  
Abobaker Emrehil Mohamed Yosef ◽  
Mohamed Ibrahim Salama

2018 ◽  
Vol 21 (04) ◽  
pp. 654-658
Author(s):  
Muhammad Imran Khan ◽  
Muhammad Saqib ◽  
Waqar Alam

Objective: The purpose of the study was to evaluate the clinical results afteroperative treatment of open tibia fractures (grade IIIA/B) with external fixator. Material andmethods: 25 patients with open fractures of the tibial diaphysis, classified as type III A and B,according to the Gustilo classification, were operatively treated in Agency Headquarter HospitalLandikotal. All the patients were treated with an external fixator. The time of the union of thefracture, problems with the union (malunion and nonunion), infection were examined astreatment outcome. Late complications and their treatment was not the object of the study. Thefollow-up period was at least 8 months. Result: The end results of the external fixation of 25 tibialshaft fractures, 18 (72%) men and 7 (28%) women, average age 37.7 (16-65). The union rate was83%. Nonunion rate was 12%. And malunion rate was 5% (fig-I). Fifteen patients had Gustilo typeIIIA injury while 10 patients had type IIIB injury (fig-II). Pins tract infection rate was 10%. Theaverage time of fractures healing was 28.5 weeks (15-22). There were 3 cases with woundinfection and no sequestrum formation. Conclusions: External fixation is a simple and effectivemeans of treating all types of open tibial shaft fractures


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document