Anatomic study of posterior interosseous nerve in the arcade of Frohse

1999 ◽  
Vol 8 (6) ◽  
pp. 617-620 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mustafa Özkan ◽  
A.Kadir Bacakoǧlu ◽  
Önder Gül ◽  
Ahmet Ekin ◽  
Orhan Maǧden
1996 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 164-168 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. INOUE ◽  
K. SHIONOYA

Four cases of constrictive neuropathy of the posterior interosseous nerve (PIN) in the absence of external compression are reported. All patients presented with a history of severe elbow pain with no apparent cause, followed by paralysis of the PIN. There were one or two well-localized constrictions on the PIN proximal to the arcade of Frohse where no obvious external compressive structure was observed. After epineurotomy with or without neurorrhaphy, three patients had a complete return of motor function within 1 year. The remaining patient required tendon transfer after resection of the abnormal segment of nerve.


Hand ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 329-332 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jason R. Ummel ◽  
John G. Coury ◽  
Zachary C. Lum ◽  
Marc A. Trzeciak

Background: Recent anatomic studies have failed to demonstrate a single utilitarian approach to intraoperative identification and surgical release of all 5 potential sites of posterior interosseous nerve (PIN) compression in the radial tunnel. This study examines if a single incision brachioradialis-splitting approach without the use of additional anatomic windows is capable of adequately exposing the entire length of the radial tunnel, including all 5 sites of PIN compression to allow for adequate release. Methods: Ten fresh frozen cadaver forearms (6 female, 4 male) were dissected utilizing a curvilinear 7 cm incision over the brachioradialis. The muscle belly was split via simple blunt retraction, exposing the radial tunnel. The PIN was identified and mobilized at 5 compression sites: radiocapitellar joint (RCJ), radial recurrent vessels (Leash of Henry), fibrous medioproximal edge of extensor carpe radialis brevis, arcade of Frohse, and distal edge of supinator. Results: The PIN was identified and effectively released in all specimens without difficulty from this single approach. All 5 sites of compression were visible and accessible through the brachioradialis-split approach. Specifically, there was no difficulty in identifying and releasing the PIN at the distal edge of supinator. Conclusions: Radial tunnel syndrome is defined as PIN compression within the radial tunnel spanning from the fibrous RCJ to the distal edge of the supinator. A single brachioradialis-splitting approach is adequate for complete visualization and release of all compression sites of the radial tunnel. Utilizing this technique allows for surgical access and ease as well as minimizing necessity for additional windows or multiple incisions.


1979 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 527
Author(s):  
Dae Yong Han ◽  
Jun Seop Jahng ◽  
Jae In Ahn ◽  
Eung Shick Kang ◽  
Min Lee

1995 ◽  
Vol 20 (5) ◽  
pp. 655-657 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. HASHIZUME ◽  
K. NISHIDA ◽  
K. YAMAMOTO ◽  
T. HIROOKA ◽  
H. INOUE

A rare case of delayed posterior interosseous nerve palsy that developed 39 years after an unreduced anterior dislocation of the radial head is reported. The posterior interosseous nerve was compressed and narrowed at the arcade of Frohse. Radial head resection and release of the arcade was done. The paralysis continued to recover 6 weeks after operation. The nerve, at the arcade of Frohse, was susceptible to compression by the dislocated radial head, especially in the supinated position. Repeated supination and pronation movement over time may have led to developmental changes that caused the delayed nerve palsy.


2019 ◽  
Vol 100 (9) ◽  
pp. 521-525 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Ceri ◽  
A. Podda ◽  
J. Behr ◽  
E. Brumpt ◽  
M. Alilet ◽  
...  

1995 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 245-248 ◽  
Author(s):  
C Debouck ◽  
M Rooze

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. e005
Author(s):  
Juan P. Simone ◽  
Philipp N. Streubel ◽  
Joaquín Sánchez-Sotelo ◽  
Scott P. Steinmann ◽  
Julie E. Adams

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document