radial head resection
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

47
(FIVE YEARS 13)

H-INDEX

10
(FIVE YEARS 1)

2021 ◽  
pp. 381-385
Author(s):  
Kozo Shimada ◽  
Ko Temporin ◽  
Keiichiro Oura ◽  
Satoshi Miyamura

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 263-270
Author(s):  
Dafang Zhang ◽  
Kyra A. Benavent ◽  
George S. M. Dyer ◽  
Brandon E. Earp ◽  
Philip Blazar

Background. Given the current available evidence, surgical treatment of radial head fracture with acute resection is controversial. The aim of this study was to determine whether acute resection of the radial head for a radial head fracture leads to longitudinal forearm instability due to a missed Essex-Lopresti injury. Material and methods. A retrospective review was conducted of radial head resections performed for acute radial head fractures at two Level I trauma centers from 2000 to 2018. A total of 11 patients met inclusion criteria. Our primary outcome was a missed Essex-Lopresti injury at time of final clinical follow-up. Long-term telephone follow-up was attempted for QuickDASH, pain scores, and satisfaction scores. Results. Of the 11 radial head fractures in this study, intraoperative radial pull tests were performed and normal in 6 patients. No patient was found to have a missed Essex-Lopresti injury at a mean of 36.2 months’ clinical follow-up after radial head resection. At a mean telephone follow-up of 12.6 years in available patients, mean QuickDASH was 3.4, mean satisfaction was 9.75 out of 10, and no further complication or reoperation was reported. Conclusion. Our findings challenge the dogma that the radial head cannot be safely excised in the setting of acute fracture, even with elbow instability and/or wrist pain, particularly when intraoperative longitudinal stability is assessed by a stress maneuver.


Author(s):  
Markus Dietzel ◽  
Simon Scherer ◽  
Michael Esser ◽  
Hans-Joachim Kirschner ◽  
Jörg Fuchs ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Pediatric radial neck and head fractures are rare, accounting for only 1% of all fractures in children. The aim of this study is to describe the management and results of the respective fracture types and different injury characteristics. Materials and methods This study performs a retrospective data analysis of 100 consecutive patients with a fracture of the proximal radius treated in a single high-volume pediatric trauma center. Results One hundred patients [mean age 7.5 years (1–15)] were documented with a fracture of the proximal radius between 3/2011 and 12/2019. The gender distribution was 62 girls and 38 boys. Twenty-seven patients had concomitant injuries. Conservative treatment was performed in 63 patients (Judet I = 27; II = 30; III = 6; Mason I = 2) using an above-the-elbow cast for 21 days (6–35). Surgical treatment was performed in 37 patients (Judet II = 3; III = 22; IV = 5; V = 7) using elastic stable intramedullary nailing (ESIN). Open reduction was necessary in five cases, and additional immobilization was performed in 32 cases. Six complications occurred: loss of implant stability (n = 2), healing in malalignment, pseudarthrosis, radioulnar synostosis, and a persisting hypoesthesia at the thumb. As a result, two ESIN osteosynthesis were revised, and one radial head resection was performed. Loss of movement was seen in 11% of cases, overall Mayo elbow performance index (MEPI) was 99.8 (90–100), and none of the patients experienced negative impacts on activities of daily life. Conclusions Proximal radial fractures occur predominately without dislocation. Good results are obtained with conservative treatment throughout. In cases with displacement exceeding growth-related correction, ESIN is the undisputed treatment of choice. Open surgery and long immobilization periods should be avoided whenever possible.


2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Erez Avisar ◽  
Jonathan Persitz ◽  
Noam Shohat ◽  
Eran Tamir ◽  
Eran Assaraf ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 131-135
Author(s):  
Ferdinand Nyankoue Mebouinz ◽  
Amadou Kasse ◽  
Mouhamadou Habib Sy

Background: Resection of the radial head is a surgical indication for comminuted radial head fracture in which internal fixation is inaccessible. Some complications from the surgery can alter the function of the patient's elbow. The objective of this study was to assess functional outcome of the elbow after resection of the radial head. Methods: A retrospective longitudinal study was performed with patients who underwent radial head resection between 2008 and 2018. Elbow function was assessed by the Mayo Elbow Performance Index (MEPI) for 11 patients comprising three women and eight men. The mean follow-up was 47.6 months. The mean age was 41±10.3 years. Results: Nine patients had a stable and painless elbow. The mean extension-flexion arc was 97.73°±16.03°. The mean values of pronation and supination were 76.8° and 74.5°, respectively. The mean MEPI score was 83.2 points, and restoration of overall function was achieved in 81% of the cases. Poor function was noted in one in 10 that presented with a terrible triad. Conclusions: Resection of the radial head restored elbow functionality at a rate of 81%, which was a good outcome for patients.


2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 130-136
Author(s):  
Moritz Bergmann ◽  
Jan El-Barbari ◽  
Felix Porschke ◽  
Paul A. Grützner ◽  
Thorsten Guehring ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liang Guo ◽  
睿夫 li ◽  
Xuhui Yang ◽  
Chao Yu ◽  
Fei Gui

Abstract Background The treatment of comminuted unsalvageable radial head fracture remains controversial. Open reduction and internal fixation are hard to achieve. Common techniques include radial head resection and arthroplasty. Both methods have characteristic complications. The present study aims to demonstrate the feasibility of treating unreducible radial head fractures with absorbable polylactide pins. Methods A total of 17 patients with severely comminuted Mason type III radial head fractures were treated with open reduction and internal fixation using polylactide pins and 23 with metallic implants. Patients receiving both modalities were followed-up for a mean of 15 months (standard deviation [SD]: 2.6). Radiographic analysis was conducted 2, 30, 60 and 120 days after surgery. Measurements of range of motion (ROM), disability of arm shoulder and hands, Mayo elbow performance score and Broberg and Morrey elbow score were recorded, with treatments compared using a Mann-Whitney U test. Result All fractures healed successfully. The data shows no statistical difference between the polylactide and metallic implant groups. Complications were infrequent and did not cause disability. All patients were satisfied with the surgical outcomes. Conclusion Polylactide pins can feasibly treat severely comminuted radial head fractures which are normally considered unreducible. The outcomes were similar to those of metallic implants. This technique provides an optional treatment plan in addition to resection and arthroplasty, especially for young patients that refuse that form of treatment.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document