805 PAIN EPIDEMIOLOGY AND QUALITY OF LIFE IN CHRONIC NONMALIGNANT PAIN PATIENTS REFERRED TO A DUTCH ACADEMIC MULTIDISCIPLINARY PAIN CENTER

2009 ◽  
Vol 13 (S1) ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Kruis ◽  
M. Dijkgraaf ◽  
M. Vegt ◽  
J. Wegener ◽  
S. Renshof ◽  
...  
Pain ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 73 (3) ◽  
pp. 393-400 ◽  
Author(s):  
Niels Becker ◽  
Annemarie Bondegaard Thomsen ◽  
Alf Kornelius Olsen ◽  
Per Sjøgren ◽  
Per Bech ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 39 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arnold J. Weil, MD ◽  
Bruce Nicholson, MD ◽  
John Sasaki, MD

Although most extended-release morphine formulations are indicated for use once-daily (q24h) or twicedaily (q12h), KADIAN® (morphine sulfate extendedrelease) capsules, which contain polymer-coated, extended-release morphine sulfate pellets, are indicated for q24h and q12h dosing. This analysis identified factors that might impact decisions to choose q24h or q12h regimens for patients with chronic, nonmalignant pain. Data were obtained from a supplemental analysis of the KRONUS-MSP trial, a community-based, open-label, 4-week study in which patients with chronic, nonmalignant pain (N = 1,428) were randomized to KADIAN q24h dosed either AM or PM. At week 2, investigators could switch to q12h dosing if indicated. For this analysis, demographics, baseline pain features, efficacy outcomes (changes in pain intensity, sleep interference, quality of life [SF-36v2 Health Survey], and Patient and Clinician Global Assessments of Therapy) were compared between patients who remained on q24h regimens and those who switched to q12h. By week 4 (n = 1,042), 56.8 percent of patients reporting were on q24h dosing, and 43.2 percent were dosing q12h. Older patients remained on q24h regimens more frequently than did younger patients. There were no differences in dosing regimen based on sex or race. Mean daily KADIAN doses and baseline pain scores were lower in patients who remained on q24h compared with those who switched to q12h. Patients who switched to q12h had higher pain scores at baseline and week 2 compared with patients who remained on q24h dosing. They demonstrated a smaller degree of change on the other efficacy outcomes than those who remained on q24h dosing at the week 2 visit. However, once switched to q12h, improvements in efficacy measures at week 4 were comparable between the two schedules; Patient and Clinician Global Assessments of Therapy scores also increased compared with previous therapy. Results were significant versus baseline for all outcomes. Adverse event rates were similar for the two groups; the most common adverse events were constipation and nausea. Results demonstrate that KADIAN was effective in relieving pain and improving sleep and quality-of-life scores, regardless of whether patients dosed q24h or q12h, and that dosing decisions can be made, based on individual factors, within the first few weeks of therapy.


2001 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 98-109 ◽  
Author(s):  
David S. Gerstle ◽  
Anita C. All ◽  
Debra C. Wallace

2017 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 188
Author(s):  
H.L.A. Kristensen ◽  
M. Madsen ◽  
P.B.F. Jensen ◽  
W.Z. Pawlak

AbstractBackgroundTreatment of patients with chronic nonmalignant pain (CNMP) is challenging and requires a multidisciplinary effort. In a multidisciplinary pain center, patients are treated by a team of doctor, nurse, physiotherapist, psychologist and social worker. Especially in the beginning of treatment patients receive much information. Many patients and their relatives have problems with comprehending it.ObjectiveThis is an action research study aimed to find the optimal mode for to introduce patients with CNMP and their relatives to the multidisciplinary pain treatment.MethodIn the fall of 2016, we began to invite patients and their relatives to the introduction meeting (IM), which takes place in groups of up to 20 people, has duration of 1 hour and is led by the physiotherapist and nurse, but the physician is also present. Invited patients are able to understand written and oral Danish and are not suffering from social phobias. During IM facts about the center, treatment course and pain physiology are presenter. Immediately after IM, participants are anonymously asked about their experiences.ResultsUp to date (February 2017) 254 patients were invited. Invitation was rejected by 63 patients (24,8%). Question about understanding of chronic pain was answered by 108 participants (both patients and their relatives), and 103 participants declared better understanding of chronic pain after IM end before. 69 participants answered question about understanding of treatment course in the center. All but 2 participants declared after IM at their understanding was better end before. In fact, 31 (44,9%) participants estimated changes in understanding of treatment course as much significant.ConclusionThe IM at the beginning of multidisciplinary therapy seems to be a promising activity for patients with CNMP referred to the multidisciplinary pain center, as well as for their relatives. Study is ongoing and updated results will be presented at the conference.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document