scholarly journals Is tutoring radical cystectomy safetely performed by residents? Impact on perioperative outcomes from high-volume center

2021 ◽  
Vol 32 ◽  
pp. S80
Author(s):  
F. Proietti ◽  
V. Palombi ◽  
R.S. Flammia ◽  
A. Tufano ◽  
E. Bologna ◽  
...  
2017 ◽  
Vol 197 (4S) ◽  
Author(s):  
Vito Palumbo ◽  
Fabio Zattoni ◽  
Afrovita Kungulli ◽  
Sabrina La Falce ◽  
Mattia Calandriello ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 17 (8) ◽  
pp. 259
Author(s):  
R. Bianchi ◽  
G. Cozzi ◽  
M. Delor ◽  
A. Mistretta ◽  
M. Catellani ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 33 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
L Giulini ◽  
D Razia ◽  
S Mittal

Abstract   Laparoscopic-assisted hiatal hernia (HH) repair has been reported to be safe and feasible. However, uncertainty exists regarding whether asymptomatic large HHs (L-HH) should be treated or if a watch-and-wait strategy should be used. The latter might expose the patient to the risk of progression and gastric incarceration. In this study, we investigated this issue by analyzing perioperative outcomes of patients who underwent HH repair at our high-volume center. Methods After obtaining approval from the Institutional Review Board, we queried a prospectively maintained database for data on patients who underwent primary minimally invasive HH repair between August 2016 and December 2019. All procedures were performed by a single surgeon (SKM). Hernias were classified in 4 groups: small (S-HH [sliding]), moderate (M-HH [<50% herniated stomach]), large (L-HH [50%–75% herniated stomach]) and giant (G-HH [≥75% herniated stomach]). Data on preoperative assessment, surgical procedure, and postoperative morbidity were analyzed and compared across groups. Complications were defined according to the Clavien-Dindo (CD) classification. Results In total, 170 patients met inclusion criteria. Mean age was 58.5 ± 11, 61.9 ± 11.3, 70.7 ± 10.3, and 72.6 ± 9.7 years for S-HH (n = 46), M-HH (n = 69), L-HH (n = 20), and G-HH (n = 35), respectively (p < 0.001). The mean operative time (minutes) increased by group as the HH size increased (69.6 ± 20.9, 83.5 ± 26.1, 99 ± 29.1, and 98.6 ± 24.9, respectively; p < 0.001). Eight of 35 patients with G-HH (22.9%) were treated urgently due to gastric incarceration. Postoperative complications were significantly more common after L-HH and G-HH repair (Figure 1). CD complications Grade II, IIIb, and IVa were observed only in patients with L-HH or G-HH. There was no mortality. Conclusion Patients with L-HH and G-HH are significantly older than those with S-HH or M-HH; this reflects the likely progressive nature of this pathology. Laparoscopic HH repair is associated with higher morbidity in patients with L-HH and G-HH. Furthermore, patients with G-HH are at risk of gastric incarceration, which requires emergency surgery. Our findings suggest that in patients with M-HH (even asymptomatic), a watch-and-wait strategy should be discouraged. Surgical repair, in experienced hands, is preferred.


Author(s):  
Mushegh A. Sahakyan ◽  
Bård I. Røsok ◽  
Tore Tholfsen ◽  
Dyre Kleive ◽  
Anne Waage ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Distal pancreatectomy is the most common procedure in minimally-invasive pancreatic surgery. Data in the literature suggest that the learning curve flattens after performing up to 30 procedures. However, the exact number remains unclear. Methods The implementation and training with laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP) in a high-volume center were studied between 1997 and 2020. Perioperative outcomes and factors related to conversion were assessed. The individual experiences of four different surgeons (pioneer and adopters) performing LDP on a regular basis were examined. Results Six hundred forty LDPs were done accounting for 95% of all distal pancreatectomies performed throughout the study period. Conversion was needed in 14 (2.2%) patients due to intraoperative bleeding or tumor adherence to the major vasculature. Overall morbidity and mortality rates were 35 and 0.6%, respectively. Intra- and postoperative outcomes did not change for any of the surgeons within their first 40 cases. Operative time significantly decreased after the first 80 cases for the pioneer surgeon and did not change afterwards although the proportion of ductal adenocarcinoma increased. Tumor size increased after the first 80 cases for the first adopter without affecting the operative time. Conclusions In this nearly unselected cohort, no significant changes in surgical outcomes were observed throughout the first 40 LDPs for different surgeons. The exact number of procedures required to overcome the learning curve is difficult to determine as it seems to depend on patient selection policy and specifics of surgical training at the corresponding center.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document