International Public Goods and Transfer of Technology Under a Globalized Intellectual Property Regime

2005 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Public Goods ◽  
International Public Goods ◽  
Transfer Of Technology ◽  
Property Regime

Maskus, K. E. - Reichman, J. H., International Public Goods and Transfer of Tecnology. Under a Globalized Intellectual Property Regime

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 89-91
Author(s):  
Veronica Grembi
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Public Goods ◽  
Cambridge University ◽  
International Public Goods ◽  
Property Regime

Abstract Maskus, K. E. - Reichman, J. H., 2005, International Public Goods and Transfer of Tecnology. Under a Globalized Intellectual Property Regime, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. xv + 922, US $ 101.00, ISBN 0-521-60302-1.

On the Essence and Tipology of International Public Goods

2005 ◽  
pp. 131-141
Author(s):  
V. Mortikov
Keyword(s):  
Economic Policy ◽  
Social Construction ◽  
Public Goods ◽  
Public Good ◽  
Global Public Goods ◽  
Club Goods ◽  
Basic Properties ◽  
International Public Goods ◽  
Regional Public Goods ◽  
Joint Products

The basic properties of international public goods are analyzed in the paper. Special attention is paid to the typology of international public goods: pure and impure, excludable and nonexcludable, club goods, regional public goods, joint products. The author argues that social construction of international public good depends on many factors, for example, government economic policy. Aggregation technologies in the supply of global public goods are examined.

scholarly journals The protection of cultural heritage: common heritage of humankind, national cultural ‘patrimony’ or private property?

2020 ◽  
Vol 64 (3) ◽  
pp. 351-364
Author(s):  
Fiona Macmillan
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Cultural Heritage ◽  
International Law ◽  
Private Property ◽  
Community Identity ◽  
Cultural Patrimony ◽  
Postcolonial Discourse ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Property Regime ◽  
Protection Of Cultural Heritage

Starting from an argument about the relationship between cultural heritage and national and/or community identity, this article considers the different ways in which both the international law regime for the protection of cultural heritage and the international intellectual property regime tend to appropriate cultural heritage. The article argues that, in the postcolonial context, both these forms of appropriation continue to interfere with the demands for justice and for the recognition of historical wrongs made both by indigenous peoples and by many developing countries. At the same time, the article suggests that these claims are undermined by the misappropriation of the postcolonial discourse with respect to restitution of cultural heritage, particularly in the intra-European context. The article advocates the need for a regime for the protection of cultural heritage that is strong enough to resist its private appropriation through the use of intellectual property rights and nuanced enough to recognise significant differences in the political context of local and national claims to cultural heritage.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document