scholarly journals P.140 A new international nomenclature of far and extreme lateral approaches to the craniocervical junction

2018 ◽  
Vol 45 (s2) ◽  
pp. S53-S53
Author(s):  
Ns Alshafai ◽  
T Klepinowski
Keyword(s):  
Literature Search ◽  
Craniocervical Junction ◽  
Foramen Magnum ◽  
Lateral Approach ◽  
Significant Discrepancy ◽  
Search Terms ◽  
Far Lateral Approach ◽  
Far Lateral ◽  
Anterolateral Aspect ◽  
Number Of Authors

Background: Far and extreme lateral approaches have become a mainstay treatment for lesions located at the anterolateral aspect of foramen magnum and its vicinity. However, there is a significant discrepancy between authors on what these approaches truly are, which leads to producing papers naming different techniques the same and same techniques differently. Methods: We performed literature search employing PubMed-MEDLINE and Scopus databases. The search terms referred to the nomenclature of far lateral approach (FLA), extreme lateral approach (ELA), and their variants. Finally, important papers on the topic from article references were also included, if deemed contributory. Results: In total, 37 articles were collected. Surprisingly, we found that not a single paper has addressed the confusing nomenclature directly yet. Nine truly separate variants of FLA and ELA were found. We implemented them intraoperatively depending on both patient and lesion characteristics. The essence about each is summarized. Conclusions: In the CNSF meeting, we will shortly discuss causes behind confusion and debate each FLA and ELA variants according to a number of authors and their unique yet sometimes confusing understanding of the approaches. Ultimately, a logical proposal for the unification is provided to stir up discussion

Endoscope-Assisted Resection of Extra-Axial Premedullary Neurenteric Cyst via Far Lateral-Supracondylar Approach: 2-Dimensional Operative Video

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kunal V Vakharia ◽  
Ryan M Naylor ◽  
Jamie J Van Gompel
Keyword(s):  
Posterior Inferior Cerebellar Artery ◽  
Cranial Nerves ◽  
Craniocervical Junction ◽  
Foramen Magnum ◽  
Lateral Approach ◽  
Neurenteric Cyst ◽  
En Bloc ◽  
Icg Angiography ◽  
Far Lateral Approach ◽  
Far Lateral

Abstract Neurenteric cysts are rare congenital lesions that may compress the ventral brainstem.1-9 In this operative video, we illustrate the surgical treatment of an intradural extra-axial neurenteric cyst extending from the lower pons to the craniocervical junction. The patient, an asymptomatic 52-yr-old female, underwent surveillance imaging of the premedullary lesion for 14 yr without progression. However, after developing progressive strain-induced headaches, imaging revealed a significant enlargement of the lesion with brainstem compression and partial obstruction of the foramen magnum. Therefore, surgical resection was pursued. The patient consented to the procedure. The patient underwent a lateral suboccipital craniotomy and C1 laminectomy through a far lateral approach. The lesion was immediately visualized upon opening the dura. After identifying the cranial nerves, we resected the tumor while taking care to preserve the neurovascular elements of the cerebellopontine angle and foramen magnum. During the resection, we unexpectedly encountered a firm nodule that was adherent to the right posterior inferior cerebellar artery. This was meticulously dissected and removed en bloc using intraoperative indocyanine green (ICG) angiography. The cavity was inspected with 0-degree and 30-degree endoscopes to ensure complete resection of the lesion. Gross total resection was confirmed on postoperative magnetic resonance imaging. The patient was neurologically intact with no cranial nerve abnormalities and discharged home on postoperative day 3. This case demonstrates that the far lateral-supracondylar approach affords safe access to the ventral pontomedullary and craniocervical junctions and that intraoperative adjuncts, including ICG angiography and endoscopic visualization, can facilitate complete lesion resection with excellent clinical outcomes.

scholarly journals Foramen Magnum Meningioma: Far Lateral Approach

2019 ◽  
Vol 80 (S 04) ◽  
pp. S363-S364
Author(s):  
Ciro Vasquez ◽  
Alexander Yang ◽  
A. Samy Youssef
Keyword(s):  
Vertebral Artery ◽  
Cranial Nerves ◽  
Mass Effect ◽  
Craniocervical Junction ◽  
Foramen Magnum ◽  
Lateral Approach ◽  
Neurological Deficits ◽  
Occipital Condyle ◽  
Far Lateral Approach ◽  
Far Lateral

We present a case of a foramen magnum meningioma in a 42-year-old female who presented with headaches for 2 years, associated with decreased sensation and overall feeling of “heaviness” of the right arm. The tumor posed significant mass effect on the brainstem, and given the location of the tumor in the anterolateral region of the foramen magnum, a right far lateral approach was chosen. The approach incorporates the interfascial dissection technique to safely expose and preserve the vertebral artery in the suboccipital triangle. After drilling the posteromedial portion of the occipital condyle and opening the dura, the tumor can be entirely exposed with minimal retraction on the cerebellum. The working space offered by the far lateral approach allows careful dissection at the lateral craniocervical junction, and preservation of the V4 segment of the vertebral artery and the lower cranial nerves. Simpson's grade-2 resection was achieved with coagulation of the dural base around the vertebral artery. The postoperative course was unremarkable for any neurological deficits. At the 2-year follow-up, imaging identified no recurrence of tumor and the patient remains asymptomatic.The link to the video can be found at: https://youtu.be/IMN1O7vO5B0.

Far-lateral approach to intradural lesions of the foramen magnum without resection of the occipital condyle

2002 ◽  
Vol 96 (2) ◽  
pp. 302-309 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anil Nanda ◽  
David A. Vincent ◽  
Prasad S. S. V. Vannemreddy ◽  
Mustafa K. Baskaya ◽  
Amitabha Chanda
Keyword(s):  
Craniocervical Junction ◽  
Foramen Magnum ◽  
Lateral Approach ◽  
Additional Patient ◽  
Occipital Condyle ◽  
Rheumatoid Disease ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Far Lateral Approach ◽  
Far Lateral ◽  
Fine Print

Object. The goal of this study was to determine whether drilling out the occipital condyle facilitates surgery via the far-lateral approach by comparing data from 10 clinical cases with that from studies of eight cadaver heads. Methods. During the last 6 years at Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center—Shreveport, 10 patients underwent surgery via the far-lateral approach to the foramen magnum. Six of these patients harbored anterior foramen magnum meningiomas, one patient a dermoid cyst, two patients vertebral artery (VA) aneurysms, and an additional patient suffered from rheumatoid disease of the craniocervical junction. The surgical approach consisted of retromastoid craniectomy and C-1 laminectomy. The seven tumors and the pannus of rheumatoid disease were completely excised, and the two aneurysms were clipped without drilling the occipital condyle. In one patient a chronic subdural hematoma was found 3 months after surgery, but no patient displayed any complication associated with surgery. It is significant that in no patient was a cerebrospinal fluid leak present. All patients experienced improved neurological function postoperatively. To compare surgical visibility, eight cadaveric specimens (16 sides) were studied, including delineation of the VA and its segments around the craniocervical junction. Increase in visibility as a function of fractional removal of the occipital condyle was quantified by measuring the degrees of visibility gained by removing one third and one half of the occipital condyle. Removal of one third of the occipital condyle produced a mean increase of 15.9° visibility, and removal of one half produced a mean increase of 19.9°. Conclusions. On the basis of their findings the authors conclude that removal of the occipital condyle is not necessary for the safe and complete resection of anterior intradural foramen magnum tumors.

Direct Lateral Approach to Pathology at the Craniocervical Junction: A Technical Note

2011 ◽  
Vol 70 (suppl_2) ◽  
pp. ons202-ons208 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kalil G. Abdullah ◽  
Richard S. Schlenk ◽  
Ajit Krishnaney ◽  
Michael P. Steinmetz ◽  
Edward C. Benzel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Craniocervical Junction ◽  
Foramen Magnum ◽  
Lateral Approach ◽  
Technical Note ◽  
Upper Cervical Spine ◽  
Endoscopic Endonasal ◽  
Far Lateral Approach ◽  
Upper Cervical ◽  
Direct Lateral Approach ◽  
Far Lateral

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Approaches to the foramen magnum and upper cervical spine traditionally include the posterior midline, far lateral, and endoscopic endonasal approaches. The far lateral approach is a well-established technique for the removal of pathology ventrolateral to the brainstem and the craniocervical junction, but it may be too extensive for lesions limited to areas far from the midline. OBJECTIVE: To present an alternative to the commonly used approaches to the foramen magnum and upper cervical. METHODS: We used an approach directly overlying ventral or lateral pathology. RESULTS: Two cases are presented in which the direct lateral approach followed by an occipitocervical fusion was successfully performed. CONCLUSION: This approach can be considered for patients in whom a ventral decompression is necessary but an endoscopic endonasal approach is undesirable or when a ventral, lateral, and ventrolateral resection of tumor, pannus, or infection is required.

scholarly journals The role of alternative anastomosis sites in occipital artery–posterior inferior cerebellar artery bypass in the absence of the caudal loop using the far-lateral approach

2017 ◽  
Vol 126 (2) ◽  
pp. 634-644 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hitoshi Fukuda ◽  
Alexander I. Evins ◽  
Koichi Iwasaki ◽  
Itaro Hattori ◽  
Kenichi Murao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Posterior Fossa ◽  
Posterior Inferior Cerebellar Artery ◽  
Technical Difficulty ◽  
Foramen Magnum ◽  
Lateral Approach ◽  
Difficulty Level ◽  
Occipital Artery ◽  
Cerebellar Artery ◽  
Far Lateral Approach ◽  
Far Lateral

OBJECTIVE Occipital artery–posterior inferior cerebellar artery (OA-PICA) bypass is a technically challenging procedure for posterior fossa revascularization. The caudal loop of the PICA is considered the optimal site for OA-PICA anastomosis, however its absence can increase the technical difficulty associated with this procedure. The use of the far-lateral approach for accessing alternative anastomosis sites in OA-PICA bypass in patients with absent or unavailable caudal loops of PICA is evaluated. METHODS A morphometric analysis of OA-PICA bypass with anastomosis on each segment of the PICA was performed on 5 cadaveric specimens through the conventional midline foramen magnum and far-lateral approaches. The difficulty level associated with anastomoses at each segment was qualitatively assessed in each approach for exposure and maneuverability by multiple surgeons. A series of 8 patients who underwent OA-PICA bypass for hemodynamic ischemia or ruptured dissecting posterior fossa aneurysms are additionally reviewed and described, and the clinical significance of the caudal loop of PICA is discussed. RESULTS Anastomosis on the caudal loop could be performed more superficially than on any other segment (p < 0.001). A far-lateral approach up to the medial border of the posterior condylar canal provided a 13.5 ± 2.2–mm wider corridor than the conventional midline foramen magnum approach, facilitating access to alternative anastomosis sites. The far-lateral approach was successfully used for OA-PICA bypass in 3 clinical cases whose caudal loops were absent, whereas the midline foramen magnum approach provided sufficient exposure for caudal loop bypass in the remaining 5 cases. CONCLUSIONS The absence of the caudal loop of the PICA is a major contributing factor to the technical difficulty of OA-PICA bypass. The far-lateral approach is a useful surgical option for OA-PICA bypass when the caudal loop of the PICA is unavailable.

scholarly journals The far-lateral approach: destruction of the condyle does not necessarily result in clinically evident craniovertebral junction instability

2016 ◽  
Vol 125 (1) ◽  
pp. 196-201 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ehab Shiban ◽  
Elisabeth Török ◽  
Maria Wostrack ◽  
Bernhard Meyer ◽  
Jens Lehmberg
Keyword(s):  
Extent Of Resection ◽  
Craniovertebral Junction ◽  
Foramen Magnum ◽  
Lateral Approach ◽  
Occipitocervical Fusion ◽  
Anterior Portion ◽  
Far Lateral Approach ◽  
Clinical Instability ◽  
Craniocervical Instability ◽  
Far Lateral

OBJECT Far-lateral or extreme-lateral approaches to the skull base allow access to the lateral and anterior portion of the lower posterior fossa and foramen magnum. These approaches include a certain extent of resection of the condyle, which potentially results in craniocervical junction instability. However, it is debated what extent of condyle resection is safe and at what extent of condyle resection an occipitocervical fusion should be recommended. The authors reviewed cases of condyle resection/destruction with regard to necessity of occipitocervical fusion. METHODS The authors conducted a retrospective analysis of all patients in whom a far- or extreme-lateral approach including condyle resection of various extents was performed between January 2007 and December 2014. RESULTS Twenty-one consecutive patients who had undergone a unilateral far- or extreme-lateral approach including condyle resection were identified. There were 10 male and 11 female patients with a median age of 61 years (range 22–83 years). The extent of condyle resection was 25% or less in 15 cases, 50% in 1 case, and greater than 75% in 5 cases. None of the patients who underwent condyle resection of 50% or less was placed in a collar postoperatively or developed neck pain. Two of the patients with condyle resection of greater than 75% were placed in a semirigid collar for a period of 3 months postoperatively and remained free of pain after this period. At last follow-up none of the cases showed any clear sign of radiological or clinical instability. CONCLUSIONS The unilateral resection or destruction of the condyle does not necessarily result in craniocervical instability. No evident instability was encountered even in the 5 patients who underwent removal of more than 75% of the condyle. The far- or extreme-lateral approach may be safer than generally accepted with regard to craniocervical instability as generally considered and may not compel fusion in all cases with condylar resection of more than 75%.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document