The total waiting time in a busy period of a stable single-server queue, I.

1969 ◽  
Vol 6 (03) ◽  
pp. 550-564 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. J. Daley

A quantity of particular interest in the study of (road) traffic jams is the total waiting time X of all vehicles involved in a given hold-up (Gaver (1969): see note following (2.3) below and the first paragraph of Section 5). With certain assumptions on the process this random variable X is the same as the sum of waiting times of customers in a busy period of a GI/G/1 queueing system, and it is the object of this paper and its sequel to study the random variable in the queueing theory context.

1969 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 550-564 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. J. Daley

A quantity of particular interest in the study of (road) traffic jams is the total waiting time X of all vehicles involved in a given hold-up (Gaver (1969): see note following (2.3) below and the first paragraph of Section 5). With certain assumptions on the process this random variable X is the same as the sum of waiting times of customers in a busy period of a GI/G/1 queueing system, and it is the object of this paper and its sequel to study the random variable in the queueing theory context.


1969 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 565-572 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. J. Daley ◽  
D. R. Jacobs

This paper is a continuation of Daley (1969), referred to as (I), whose notation and numbering is continued here. We shall indicate various approaches to the study of the total waiting time in a busy period2 of a stable single-server queue with a Poisson arrival process at rate λ, and service times independently distributed with common distribution function (d.f.) B(·). Let X'i denote3 the total waiting time in a busy period which starts at an epoch when there are i (≧ 1) customers in the system (to be precise, the service of one customer is just starting and the remaining i − 1 customers are waiting for service). We shall find the first two moments of X'i, prove its asymptotic normality for i → ∞ when B(·) has finite second moment, and exhibit the Laplace-Stieltjes transform of X'i in M/M/1 as the ratio of two Bessel functions.


1965 ◽  
Vol 14 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 163-166 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. N. Shanbhag

Summary: In this note all alternative proof of Lindley's (1952) theorem for the existence of the stationary state distribution of the waiting time of a customer in the queueing system GI/G/1 is given. Further, a direct and simple method is given for deriving the stationary state distribution of the waiting time in the queueing system GI/M/1.


1976 ◽  
Vol 13 (03) ◽  
pp. 619-622 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. W. Cohen

The queueing system GI/G/1 with group arrivals and individual service of the customers is considered. For the stable situation the limiting distribution of the waiting time distribution of the kth served customer for k → ∞ is derived by using the theory of regenerative processes. It is assumed that the group sizes are i.i.d. variables of which the distribution is aperiodic. The relation between this limiting distribution and the stationary distribution of the virtual waiting time is derived.


1976 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 619-622 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. W. Cohen

The queueing system GI/G/1 with group arrivals and individual service of the customers is considered. For the stable situation the limiting distribution of the waiting time distribution of the kth served customer for k → ∞ is derived by using the theory of regenerative processes. It is assumed that the group sizes are i.i.d. variables of which the distribution is aperiodic. The relation between this limiting distribution and the stationary distribution of the virtual waiting time is derived.


1971 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 494-507 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. K. Kyprianou

We consider a single server queueing system M/G/1 in which customers arrive in a Poisson process with mean λt, and the service time has distribution dB(t), 0 < t < ∞. Let W(t) be the virtual waiting time process, i.e., the time that a potential customer arriving at the queueing system at time t would have to wait before beginning his service. We also let the random variable denote the first busy period initiated by a waiting time u at time t = 0.


1969 ◽  
Vol 6 (03) ◽  
pp. 565-572 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. J. Daley ◽  
D. R. Jacobs

This paper is a continuation of Daley (1969), referred to as (I), whose notation and numbering is continued here. We shall indicate various approaches to the study of the total waiting time in a busy period2 of a stable single-server queue with a Poisson arrival process at rate λ, and service times independently distributed with common distribution function (d.f.) B(·). Let X'i denote3 the total waiting time in a busy period which starts at an epoch when there are i (≧ 1) customers in the system (to be precise, the service of one customer is just starting and the remaining i − 1 customers are waiting for service). We shall find the first two moments of X'i, prove its asymptotic normality for i → ∞ when B(·) has finite second moment, and exhibit the Laplace-Stieltjes transform of X'i in M/M/1 as the ratio of two Bessel functions.


1978 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 125-129
Author(s):  
A. Ghosal

In a single-server queueing system, subject to the queue discipline ‘First come first served’, the equilibrium distribution function of the waiting time of a server depends on the distribution of the random variable (u) which is the difference between the service time and the inter-arrival time. If in two queueing systems u's are equivalent in distribution, the waiting times are also equivalent in distribution (known result). It has been shown in this note that equivalence in waiting time distributions does not necessarily imply equivalence in distributions of u's. The proof is heuristic. This result has useful practical implications.


1971 ◽  
Vol 8 (03) ◽  
pp. 494-507 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. K. Kyprianou

We consider a single server queueing system M/G/1 in which customers arrive in a Poisson process with mean λt, and the service time has distribution dB(t), 0 &lt; t &lt; ∞. Let W(t) be the virtual waiting time process, i.e., the time that a potential customer arriving at the queueing system at time t would have to wait before beginning his service. We also let the random variable denote the first busy period initiated by a waiting time u at time t = 0.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document