New Directions in the Law of the Sea. Vols. 5 and 6, edited by Robin Churchill, Myron Nordquist, and S. Houston Lay; Vols. 7 and 8, edited by Myron Nordquist, S. Houston Lay, and Kenneth R. Simmonds; Vols. 9 and 10, edited by Myron Nordquist and Kenneth R. Simmonds. London and New York: The British Institute of International and Comparative Law and Oceana Publications Inc. 1977-80. Vols. 5 and 6, pp. 975 incl. index; Vol. 7, pp. xii, 500; Vol. 8, pp. v, 440; Vol. 9, pp. v, 490; Vol. 10, pp. iv, 495 ($U.S. 30, Vols. 5-6; $U.S. 40, Vols. 7-10). - International Law of the Sea: A Bibliography. By Nikos Papadakis. Alphen aan Rijn: Sijthoff & Nordhoff, 1981. Pp. xvii, 457 ($Can. 105). - The Eastern European States and the Development of the Law of the Sea. Vol. I. By Viktor Sebek. Dobbs Ferry, N.Y.: Oceana Publications, Inc., 1977. Pp. xxi, 574 and appendices ($U.S. 60). - The Lawfulness of Deep Seabed Mining. By Theodore G. Kronmiller, 2 vols. New York: Oceana Publications, Inc., 1981. Vol. I, pp. xix, 521; Vol. 2, pp. iii, 460.

Author(s):  
D. M. McRae
1987 ◽  
Vol 81 (2) ◽  
pp. 438-442 ◽  
Author(s):  

In 1983, President Reagan announced the policy of the United States to accept the normative provisions of the 1982 Convention on the Law of the Sea as reflecting the customary international law of the sea (in matters other than deep seabed mining).


1989 ◽  
Vol 48 (1) ◽  
pp. 85-97 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen Vasciannie

On 30 April 1982, after almost a decade of careful negotiations at the Third U.N. Conference on the Law of the Sea, the Law of the Sea Convention was adopted by the positive votes of 130 States. In one of its main sections, Part XI, the Convention sets out a detailed regime for the exploration and exploitation of the deep seabed and its resources and firmly places deep seabed mining under the regulatory control of the International Seabed Authority, to be established in Jamaica. However, as is well known, the United States and certain other Western countries have adopted a negative posture towards various aspects of Part XI and, for this reason, they are unlikely to ratify the 1982 Convention in the near future. Against this background, the question whether the provisions in Part XI may be binding evenvis-à-visnon-parties to the LOSC has assumed considerable importance in contemporary international law.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document