On the nature of brief visual storage: There never was an icon

1983 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-33 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. J. K. Mewhort ◽  
B. E. Butler
Keyword(s):  
Visual Storage

The visual arrays task…visual storage capacity or attention control?

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessie Martin ◽  
Jason S. Tsukahara ◽  
Christopher Draheim ◽  
Zach Shipstead ◽  
Cody Mashburn ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Working Memory ◽  
Storage Capacity ◽  
Working Memory Capacity ◽  
Memory Capacity ◽  
Attention Control ◽  
Data Sets ◽  
Independent Data ◽  
Visual Storage ◽  
Design Selection ◽  
The Relationship

**The uploaded manuscript is still in preparation** In this study, we tested the relationship between visual arrays tasks and working memory capacity and attention control. Specifically, we tested whether task design (selection or non-selection demands) impacted the relationship between visual arrays measures and constructs of working memory capacity and attention control. Using analyses from 4 independent data sets we showed that the degree to which visual arrays measures rely on selection influences the degree to which they reflect domain-general attention control.

Post-Retinal Visual Storage

1965 ◽  
Vol 78 (1) ◽  
pp. 145 ◽  
Author(s):  
Theodore E. Parks
Keyword(s):  
Visual Storage

New Estimate for Storage Time in Sensory Memory

1984 ◽  
Vol 59 (3) ◽  
pp. 683-686 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jesse E. Purdy ◽  
Kelly M. Olmstead
Keyword(s):  
Visual Memory ◽  
Interstimulus Interval ◽  
Storage Time ◽  
Recognition Task ◽  
Sensory Memory ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Short Term Visual Memory ◽  
Visual Storage ◽  
Sensory Storage ◽  
Information Transfers

Sperling in 1960 reported information in sensory storage remained for about one sec. In 1974 Phillips reported that information in sensory storage passed on to short-term visual memory after 100 msec. To distinguish between these alternatives, 55 subjects received 36 trials in which two matrices of letters, familiar shapes, or non-familiar shapes were presented successively in a recognition task. The interstimulus interval varied systematically. Results showed that as the interval increased, performance decreased. Further, memory for letters and familiar shapes was superior. Finally, there were no differences among letters, familiar shapes, and non-familiar shapes at the .25-sec. interval. At the .5-sec. interval, performance for familiar shapes was superior to performance for non-familiar shapes. It was concluded that information transfers to short-term visual storage after .25 sec.

The effects of orientation-specific adaptation on the duration of short-term visual storage

1975 ◽  
Vol 15 (5) ◽  
pp. 569-572 ◽  
Author(s):  
Glenn E. Meyer ◽  
Robert Lawson ◽  
Walter Cohen
Keyword(s):  
Short Term ◽  
Specific Adaptation ◽  
Visual Storage

scholarly journals Short-term visual storage

1967 ◽  
Vol 2 (8) ◽  
pp. 383-386 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven W. Keele ◽  
William G. Chase
Keyword(s):  
Short Term ◽  
Visual Storage
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document