Bounded representations of the positive values of an indefinite quadratic form

Author(s):  
B. Lawton

Letbe a real quadratic form in n variables (n ≥ 2) with integral coefficients and determinant D = |fij| ≠ 0. Cassels ((1),(2)) has recently proved that if the equation f = 0 is properly soluble in integers x1, …, xn, then there is a solution satisfyingwhere F = max | fij and cn depends only on n. An example given by Kneser (see (2)) shows that the exponent ½(n – 1) is best possible. A simpler proof of Cassels's result has since been given by Davenport(3), and the theorem has been improved in certain cases by Watson(4). Here I consider the inequality f(x1, …, xn) > 0, where f is an indefinite form, and obtain a result analogous to that of Cassels.

1981 ◽  
Vol 89 (2) ◽  
pp. 225-235 ◽  
Author(s):  
Madhu Raka

Let Qr be a real indefinite quadratic form in r variables of determinant D ≠ 0 and of type (r1, r2), 0 < r1 < r, r = r1 + r2, S = r1 − r2 being the signature of Qr. It is known (e.g. Blaney (3)) that, given any real numbers c1, c2,…, cr, there exists a constant C depending only on r and s such that the inequalityhas a solution in integers x1, x2, …, xr.


Author(s):  
Madhu Raka

Let Qn be a real indefinite quadratic form in n variables x1, x2,…, xn, of determinant D ≠ 0 and of type (r, s), 0 < r < n, n = r + s. Let σ denote the signature of Qn so that σ = r − s. It is known (see e.g. Blaney(4)) that, given any real numbers c1 c2, …, cn, there exists a constant C depending upon n and σ only such that the inequalityhas a solution in integers x1, x2, …, xn. Let Cr, s denote the infimum of all such constants. Clearly Cr, s = Cs, r, so we need consider non-negative signatures only. For n = 2, C1, 1 = ¼ follows from a classical result of Minkowski on the product of two linear forms. When n = 3, Davenport (5) proved that C2, 1 = 27/100. For all n and σ = 0, Birch (3) proved that Cr, r = ¼. In 1962, Watson(18) determined the values of Cr, s for all n ≥ 21 and for all signatures σ. He proved thatWatson also conjectured that (1·2) holds for all n ≥ 4. Dumir(6) proved Watson's conjecture for n = 4. For n = 5, it was proved by Hans-Gill and Madhu Raka(7, 8). The author (12) has proved the conjecture for σ = 1 and all n. In the preceding paper (13) we proved that C5, 1 = 1. In this paper we prove Watson's conjecture for σ = 2, 3 and 4.


1963 ◽  
Vol 15 ◽  
pp. 412-421 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. H. H. Chalk

Letbe an indefinite quadratic form in the integer variables x1, . . . , xn with real coefficients of determinant D = ||ars||(n) ≠ 0. The homogeneous minimum MH(Qn) and the inhomogeneous minimum MI(Qn) of Qn(x) are defined as follows :


Author(s):  
Madhu Raka

The famous conjecture of Watson(11) on the minima of indefinite quadratic forms in n variables has been proved for n ≤ 5, n ≥ 21 and for signatures 0 and ± 1. For the details and history of the conjecture the reader is referred to the author's paper(8). In the succeeding paper (9), we prove Watson's conjecture for signature ± 2 and ± 3 and for all n. Thus only one case for n = 6 (i.e. forms of type (1, 5) or (5, 1)) remains to he proved which we do here; thereby completing the case n = 6. This result is also used in (9) for proving the conjecture for all quadratic forms of signature ± 4. More precisely, here we prove:Theorem 1. Let Q6(x1, …, x6) be a real indefinite quadratic form in six variables of determinant D ( < 0) and of type (5, 1) or (1, 5). Then given any real numbers ci, 1 ≤ i ≤ 6, there exist integers x1,…, x6such that


1968 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 287-303 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vishwa Chander Dumir

In a previous paper [4] we showed that Γ3,1 = 16/. For the definition of Γr, s for an indefinite quadratic form in n = r + s variables of the type (r, s) see the above paper. Here we shall show that Γ2,2 = 16. More precisely we prove: Theorem. Let Q (x, y, z, t) be an indefinite quaternary quadratic form with determinant D > 0 and signature (2, 2). Then given any real numbers x0, y0, z0, t0 we can find integers x, y, z, t such thatEquality is necessary if and only if either where ρ ≠ 0. For Q1 equality occurs if and only if


1968 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 87-101 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vishwa Chander Dumir

Let Q(x1, …, xn) be an indefinite quadratic form in n-variables with real coefficients, determinant D ≠ 0 and signature (r, s), r+s = n. Then it is known (e.g. see Blaney [2]) that there exist constants Γr, s depending only on r and s such for any real numbers c1, …, cn we can find integers x1, …, xn satisfying


1948 ◽  
Vol 44 (2) ◽  
pp. 145-154 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. W. S. Cassels

In this paper, all numbers are real and all radicals are positive.Let f(x, y) = ax2 + bxy + cy2 be an indefinite quadratic form, and let d = Δ2 = b2 − 4ac, where Δ > 0. A well-known theorem of Minkowski states that, if (x0, y0) is any pair of numbers, then there exists a pair (x, y), x ≡ x0 (mod 1), y ≡ y0 (mod 1), say (x, y) ≡ (x0, y0) (mod 1), such thatfor k ≥ ¼, and Davenport has shown how this result may be improved if we know a value assumed by f(x, y) for coprime integral values, (x, y) = (m, n) ≠ (0, 0). In this paper, we discuss the more general inequalitywhere R and S are constants, and use the method developed in the first paper of this series to obtain a sharper and more general theorem than Davenport's. We give an application to the theory of real Euclidean quadratic fields and to a problem in Diophantine approximation discussed by Khintchine.


1961 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 9-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. S. Barnes

If f(x) is a real indefinite quadratic form in n variables with determinant d ≠ 0, we set for any real α.


1967 ◽  
Vol 63 (2) ◽  
pp. 277-290 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vishwa Chander Dumir

Let Q (x1, …, xn) be a real indefinite quadratic form in n-variables x1,…, xn with signature (r, s),r + s = n and determinant D ≠ 0. Then it is known (see Blaney (2)) that there exists constant Cr, s depending only on r, s such that given any real numbers c1, …,cn we can find integers x1, …, xn satisfying


1948 ◽  
Vol 44 (4) ◽  
pp. 457-462
Author(s):  
J. W. S. Cassels

1. Letwhere a > 0, be an indefinite quadratic form, so that d = b2 − 4ac > 0. A classical theorem of Minkowski states that, if (x0, y0) is any pair of real numbers, there are numbers (x, y) congruent (mod 1) to (x0, y0), such thatand, more recently, Davenport has shown that this theorem can be sharpened for certain special f, for instance that it is always possible to satisfy


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document