On the summability |N, pn| of a Fourier series at a point

1969 ◽  
Vol 65 (2) ◽  
pp. 495-506 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. P. Dikshit

Let ∑an be a given infinite series and {sn} the sequence of its partial sums. Let {pn} be a sequence of constants, real or complex, and let us write

1973 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 599-602
Author(s):  
D. S. Goel ◽  
B. N. Sahney

Let be a given infinite series and {sn} the sequence of its partial sums. Let {pn} be a sequence of constants, real or complex, and let us write(1.1)If(1.2)as n→∞, we say that the series is summable by the Nörlund method (N,pn) to σ. The series is said to be absolutely summable (N,pn) or summable |N,pn| if σn is of bounded variation, i.e.,(1.3)


1967 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 252-256 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fu Cheng Hsiang

Let Σn−0∞an, be a given infinite series and {sn} the sequence of its partial sums. Let {pn} be a sequence of constants, real or complex, and let us writeIfas n → ∞, then we say that the series is summable by the Nörlund method (N, pn) to σ And the series a,Σan, is said to be absolutely summable (N, pn) or summable |N, Pn| if {σn} is of bounded variation, i.e.,


1971 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 86-90 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. D. Dikshit

Let σan be an infinite series, with sequence of partial sums {un}. Let {pn} be a sequence of constants, real or complex, and write Pn = po+p1+ … +pn The sequence-to-sequence transformation defines the sequence {tn} of Nörlund means of the sequence {u}, generated by the sequence {pn}. The series σan is said to be surnmable (N, pn), to sum s, if limn→∞ tn = s. It is said to be absolutely sum.mable (N, pn), or summable |N, pn|, if {tn} ∈BV.


1969 ◽  
Vol 66 (2) ◽  
pp. 355-363
Author(s):  
N. Tripathy

Let be a given infinite series with the sequence of partial sums {sn}. Then the sequence-to-sequence Hausdorff transformation of the sequence {sn} is given by


1972 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-17
Author(s):  
F. M. Khan

Let pn>0 be such that pn diverges, and the radius of convergence of the power seriesis 1. Given any series σan with partial sums sn, we shall use the notationand


1970 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 202-208 ◽  
Author(s):  
H.-H. Körle

1. The Cesàro methods for ordinary [9, p. 17; 6, p. 96] and for absolute [9, p. 25] summation of infinite series can be generalized by the Riesz methods [7, p. 21; 12; 9, p. 52; 6, p. 86; 5, p. 2] and by “the generalized Cesàro methods“ introduced by Burkill [4] and Borwein and Russell [3]. (Also cf. [2]; for another generalization, see [8].) These generalizations raise the question as to their equivalence.We shall consider series(1)with complex terms an. Throughout, we will assume that(2)and we call (1) Riesz summable to a sum s relative to the type λ = (λn) and to the order κ, or summable (R, λ, κ) to s briefly, if the Riesz means(of the partial sums of (1)) tend to s as x → ∞.


Author(s):  
O. P. Varshney ◽  
Govind Prasad

Let Σan be a given infinite series with the sequence of partial sums {Sn}. Let the sequence be defined bywhere is given by


1972 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 470-481 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. P. Dikshit

Let Σan be a given infinite series with the sequence of partial sums {Sn}. Let {Pn} be a sequence of constants, real or complex, and let us write Pn = p0 + p1 + … + pn; P-1 = P-1 = 0.


1967 ◽  
Vol 63 (1) ◽  
pp. 107-118 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. N. Mohapatra ◽  
G. Das ◽  
V. P. Srivastava

Definition. Let {sn} be the n-th partial sum of a given infinite series. If the transformationwhereis a sequence of bounded variation, we say that εanis summable |C, α|.


Author(s):  
G. Das

Let be the given infinite series with {sn} as the sequence of partial sums and let be the binomial coefficient of zn in the power series expansion of the function (l-z)-σ-1 |z| < 1. Now let, for β > – 1,converge for 0 ≤ x < 1. If fβ(x) → s as x → 1–, then we say that ∑an is summable (Aβ) to s. If, further, f(x) is a function of bounded variation in (0, 1), then ∑an is summable |Aβ| or absolutely summable (Aβ). We write this symbolically as {sn} ∈ |Aβ|. This method was first introduced by Borwein in (l) where he proves that for α > β > -1, (Aα) ⊂ (Aβ). Note that for β = 0, (Aβ) is the same as Abel method (A). Borwein (2) also introduced the (C, α, β) method as follows: Let α + β ╪ −1, −2, … Then the (C, α, β) mean is defined by


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document