scholarly journals On (J, pn)-summability of Fourier series

1972 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-17
Author(s):  
F. M. Khan

Let pn>0 be such that pn diverges, and the radius of convergence of the power seriesis 1. Given any series σan with partial sums sn, we shall use the notationand

1982 ◽  
Vol 92 (1) ◽  
pp. 121-127 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jamil A. Siddiqi

1. A series with partial sums {An} is said to be summable (e, c) (c > 0) ifexists, where it is to be understood that An+k = 0 when n+k < 0. The (e, c)-sum-mability method which is a regular method of summation was introduced by Hardy and Littlewood (3) (cf. also (5)) as an auxiliary method to prove the Tauberian theorem for Borel summability, viz, if Σan is summable (B) to A and an = 0(n−½), then it converges to A.


1973 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 599-602
Author(s):  
D. S. Goel ◽  
B. N. Sahney

Let be a given infinite series and {sn} the sequence of its partial sums. Let {pn} be a sequence of constants, real or complex, and let us write(1.1)If(1.2)as n→∞, we say that the series is summable by the Nörlund method (N,pn) to σ. The series is said to be absolutely summable (N,pn) or summable |N,pn| if σn is of bounded variation, i.e.,(1.3)


1975 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 97-102
Author(s):  
G. D. Dikshit

AbstractLet and .In 1951 Mohanty proved the following theorem: .In this paper a general theorem on summability |R,l (w), 1 | of Σ An(x) has been given which improves upon Mohanty's result in different ways (see Corollaries 1, 2 and 3) and it is also shown that some of the results of this note are the best possible.


1979 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 345-350 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. S. B. Holland ◽  
B. N. Sahney ◽  
J. Tzimbalario

Let {ank} be a matrix defined by1and n taking only non-negative integer values.Let f(x) ∈ L [0, 2π] and be periodic with period 2π outside this interval. Let the Fourier series associated with the function f(x) be given byand letwhere s is a constant.


Author(s):  
D. Borwein

SynopsisGiven a power series with real non-negative coefficients and having radius of convergence p, a summability method P is defined as follows:The main concern of this note is to establish conditions sufficient for one such method to include another.


2001 ◽  
Vol 33 (5) ◽  
pp. 543-552 ◽  
Author(s):  
JEAN-PIERRE KAHANE ◽  
ANTONIOS D. MELAS

We prove the existence of a power series having radius of convergence 0, whose partial sums have universal approximation properties on any compact set with connected complement that is contained in a finite union of circles centred at 0 and having rational radii, but do not have such properties on any compact set with nonempty interior. This relates to a theorem of A. I. Seleznev.


1951 ◽  
Vol 47 (3) ◽  
pp. 477-482 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. G. Eggleston

When two functions are given, each with a finite radius of convergence, a theorem due independently to Hurwitz and Pincherle (1, 2) provides information about the position of the singularities of the functionin terms of the positions of the singularities of f(z) and g(z).


1980 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 199-205
Author(s):  
Gerhard Otto Müller ◽  
Rolf Trautner

Consider a formal serieswith partial sumsand the corresponding power series. Throughout we will assume thatfis analytic for |z| <1, i.e. thatA classical theorem of Fatou-Riesz (see (1,4)) states that ifandthenis convergent to 0.


1930 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 173-203 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. E. A. C. Paley

For r>-1, let denoteIfwe say that the series a0 + a1 + a2 +…+an+… is summable by Cesàro mean of order r, or more shortly summable (C, r) to sum s. If r >−1, andwe say that the series is summable by Rieszian mean of order r to the sum s. It has been shown that these two methods of summation are equivalent. Throughout this paper I shall deal with the Rieszian mean, but I shall retain the symbol (C, r). It is known† that if a series is summable (C, r), it is also summable (C, r′) to the same sum for all numbers r′ greater than r.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document