Typing and subtyping for mobile processes

1996 ◽  
Vol 6 (5) ◽  
pp. 409-453 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin Pierce ◽  
Davide Sangiorgi

The π-calculus is a process algebra that supports mobility by focusing on the communication of channels. Milner's presentation of the π-calculus includes a type system assigning arities to channels and enforcing a corresponding discipline in their use. We extend Milner's language of types by distinguishing between the ability to read from a channel, the ability to write to a channel, and the ability both to read and to write. This refinement gives rise to a natural subtype relation similar to those studied in typed λ-calculi. The greater precision of our type discipline yields stronger versions of standard theorems on the π-calculus. These can be used, for example, to obtain the validity of β-reduction for the more efficient of Milner's encodings of the call-by-value λ-calculus, which fails in the ordinary π-calculus. We define the syntax, typing, subtyping, and operational semantics of our calculus, prove that the typing rules are sound, apply the system to Milner's λ-calculus encodings, and sketch extensions to higher-order process calculi and polymorphic typing.

1998 ◽  
Vol 8 (5) ◽  
pp. 447-491 ◽  
Author(s):  
WILLIAM FERREIRA ◽  
MATTHEW HENNESSY ◽  
ALAN JEFFREY

Concurrent ML (CML) is an extension of Standard ML of New Jersey with concurrent features similar to those of process algebra. In this paper, we build upon John Reppy's reduction semantics for CML by constructing a compositional operational semantics for a fragment of CML, based on higher-order process algebra. Using the operational semantics we generalise the notion of weak bisimulation equivalence to build a semantic theory of CML. We give some small examples of proofs about CML expressions, and show that our semantics corresponds to Reppy's up to weak first-order bisimulation.


1996 ◽  
Vol 131 (2) ◽  
pp. 141-178 ◽  
Author(s):  
Davide Sangiorgi

2001 ◽  
Vol 266 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 839-852 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mingsheng Ying ◽  
Martin Wirsing

2002 ◽  
Vol 9 (49) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mikkel Nygaard ◽  
Glynn Winskel

A small but powerful language for higher-order nondeterministic processes is introduced. Its roots in a linear domain theory for concurrency are sketched though for the most part it lends itself to a more operational account. The language can be viewed as an extension of the lambda calculus with a ``prefixed sum'', in which types express the form of computation path of which a process is capable. Its operational semantics, bisimulation, congruence properties and expressive power are explored; in particular, it is shown how it can directly encode process languages such as CCS, CCS with process passing, and mobile ambients with public names.


2004 ◽  
Vol 11 (21) ◽  
Author(s):  
Glynn Winskel ◽  
Francesco Zappa Nardelli

This paper introduces new-HOPLA, a concise but powerful language for higher-order nondeterministic processes with name generation. Its origins as a metalanguage for domain theory are sketched but for the most part the paper concentrates on its operational semantics. The language is typed, the type of a process describing the shape of the computation paths it can perform. Its transition semantics, bisimulation, congruence properties and expressive power are explored. Encodings are given of well-known process algebras, including pi-calculus, Higher-Order pi-calculus and Mobile Ambients.


2003 ◽  
Vol 10 (42) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mikkel Nygaard ◽  
Glynn Winskel

A fully abstract denotational semantics for the higher-order process language HOPLA is presented. It characterises contextual and logical equivalence, the latter linking up with simulation. The semantics is a clean, domain-theoretic description of processes as downwards-closed sets of computation paths: the operations of HOPLA arise as syntactic encodings of canonical constructions on such sets; full abstraction is a direct consequence of expressiveness with respect to computation paths; and simple proofs of soundness and adequacy shows correspondence between the denotational and operational semantics.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document