Do infants with transposition of the great arteries born outside a specialist centre have different outcomes?

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (8) ◽  
pp. 1030-1035 ◽  
Author(s):  
Colin Veal ◽  
Richard Hunt ◽  
Lyvonne N. Tume
Keyword(s):  
Arterial Switch Operation ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
District General Hospital ◽  
Definitive Treatment ◽  
General Hospitals ◽  
Arterial Switch ◽  
Tertiary Centre ◽  
South Wales ◽  
Switch Operation ◽  
Specialist Centre

AbstractBackground:Infants born with undiagnosed transposition of the great arteries continue to be born in district general hospitals despite the improvements made in antenatal scanning. Evidence indicates improved outcomes with early definitive treatment after birth, hence the recommendation of delivery in a tertiary centre. The role of specialist paediatric and neonatal transport teams, to advise, stabilise, and transport the infants to a tertiary centre in a timely manner, is critical for those infants born in a district general hospital. This pilot study aims to compare outcomes between infants born in district general hospitals and those who were born in a tertiary maternity unit in South West England and South Wales.Methods:This was a secondary data analysis of data collected from the local Paediatric Intensive Care Audit Network and the local transport database. Infants born with a confirmed diagnosis of transposition of the great arteries, that required an arterial switch operation as the definitive procedure between April, 2012 and March 2018 were included.Results:Forty-five infants with a confirmed diagnosis of transposition of the great arteries were included. Statistical analysis demonstrated there were no significant differences in the time to balloon atrial septostomy (p = 0.095), time to arterial switch operation (p = 0.461), length of paediatric ICU stay (p = 0.353), and hospital stay (p = 0.095) or mortality between the two groups.Conclusions:We found no significant differences in outcomes between infants delivered outside the specialist centre, who were transferred in by a specialist team.

Alternative pulmonary artery reconstruction technique in the arterial switch operation

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hisayuki Hongu ◽  
Masaaki Yamagishi ◽  
Yoshinobu Maeda ◽  
Keiichi Itatani ◽  
Masatoshi Shimada ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pulmonary Artery ◽  
Arterial Switch Operation ◽  
Late Complication ◽  
Late Complications ◽  
Reconstruction Technique ◽  
Reconstruction Method ◽  
Arterial Switch ◽  
Switch Operation ◽  
Longitudinal Extension

Abstract OBJECTIVES Late complications of arterial switch operations (ASO) for transposition of the great arteries, such as neo-pulmonary artery (PA) stenosis and/or neoaortic regurgitation, have been reported. We developed an alternative reconstruction method called the longitudinal extension (LE) method to prevent PA bifurcation stenosis (PABS). METHODS We identified 48 patients diagnosed with transposition of the great arteries and performed ASO using the Lecompte manoeuvre for neo-PA reconstruction. In 9 consecutive patients (from 2014), the LE method was performed (LE). Before 2014, conventional techniques were performed in 39 patients (C). The median body weight and age in the LE and C groups were 3.0 and 3.1 kg and 12 and 26 days, respectively. In the LE group, 1 patient underwent bilateral PA banding before ASO. In C, PA banding and arch repair were performed in 1 patient each. Patients who received concomitant procedures were included. RESULTS The median follow-up in LE and C groups was 1.9 and 10.1 years, respectively. Early mortality/late death was not found in group LE and in 1 patient in group C. Only 1 case required ascending aorta sliding plasty in LE, and 8 patients needed PA augmentation for PABS in C. The median velocity of right/left PA was measured as 1.6/1.9 m/s in LE and 2.1/2.3 m/s in C, so it showed a lower value in LE. CONCLUSIONS Excellent mid-term results were obtained with the LE method. It was considered a useful procedure in preventing PABS, which is a primary late complication of ASO. Further follow-up and investigations are needed.

scholarly journals Primary Arterial Switch Operation for TGA/IVS and Regressed Left Ventricle: How and When to Use Left Ventricular Assist Device

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 97-100
Author(s):  
Dhananjay P. Malankar ◽  
Sachin Patil ◽  
Shivaji Mali ◽  
Shyam Dhake ◽  
Amit Mhatre ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Left Ventricle ◽  
Left Ventricular Assist Device ◽  
Ventricular Assist Device ◽  
Arterial Switch Operation ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Assist Device ◽  
Ventricular Assist ◽  
Arterial Switch ◽  
Switch Operation ◽  
Left Ventricular Assist

Purpose: Numerous attempts have been made to extend the boundaries of arterial switch operation (ASO) in children presenting late with transposition of great arteries with intact ventricular septum (TGA/IVS) and regressed left ventricle (rLV). Many children tolerate the delayed ASO uneventfully, whereas others need mechanical circulatory support (MCS) to sustain the systemic circulation while the left ventricle undergoes retraining. Description: In this article, we describe six consecutive children with TGA/IVS and rLV who underwent primary ASO. Results: Three were managed medically, while three required MCS in the form of Centrimag left ventricular assist device (LVAD). All patients survived the operation and were discharged home in a stable condition. Conclusions: Primary ASO can be safely performed in children with TGA/IVS and rLV, provided the center has MCS options. Supporting the rLV with LVAD is feasible and can be achieved safely.

Extending the limits of the primary arterial switch operation for TGA

2006 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 47-47
Author(s):  
P Krishnan ◽  
SK Pranav ◽  
K Sivakumar ◽  
J Shahani ◽  
M Srinivias
Keyword(s):  
Arterial Switch Operation ◽  
Arterial Switch ◽  
Switch Operation
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document