Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in Wastewater: Community Variability, Temporal Dynamics, and Genotype Diversity

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhiquan Song ◽  
Ryan Reinke ◽  
Mike Hoxsey ◽  
James Jackson ◽  
Eric Krikorian ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Silvia Zaoli ◽  
Jacopo Grilli

The most fundamental questions in microbial ecology concern the diversity and variability of communities. Their composition varies widely across space and time, as it is determined by a non-trivial combination of stochastic and deterministic processes. The interplay between non-linear community dynamics and environmental fluctuations determines the rich statistical structure of community variability, with both rapid temporal dynamics fluctuations and non-trivial correlations across habitats. Here we analyze long time-series of gut microbiome and compare intra- and inter-community dissimilarity. Under a macroecological framework we characterize their statistical properties. We show that most taxa have large but stationary fluctuations over time, while a minority is characterized by quick changes of average abundance which cluster in time, suggesting the presence of alternative stable states. We disentangle inter-individual variability in a major stochastic component and a deterministic one, the latter recapitulated by differences in the carrying capacities of taxa. Finally, we develop a model which includes environmental fluctuations and alternative stable states. This model quantitatively predicts the statistical properties of both intra- and inter-individual community variability, therefore summarizing variation in a unique macroecological framework.


Author(s):  
Thomas Kleinsorge ◽  
Gerhard Rinkenauer

In two experiments, effects of incentives on task switching were investigated. Incentives were provided as a monetary bonus. In both experiments, the availability of a bonus varied on a trial-to-trial basis. The main difference between the experiments relates to the association of incentives to individual tasks. In Experiment 1, the association of incentives to individual tasks was fixed. Under these conditions, the effect of incentives was largely due to reward expectancy. Switch costs were reduced to statistical insignificance. This was true even with the task that was not associated with a bonus. In Experiment 2, there was a variable association of incentives to individual tasks. Under these conditions, the reward expectancy effect was bound to conditions with a well-established bonus-task association. In conditions in which the bonus-task association was not established in advance, enhanced performance of the bonus task was accompanied by performance decrements with the task that was not associated with a bonus. Reward expectancy affected mainly the general level of performance. The outcome of this study may also inform recently suggested neurobiological accounts about the temporal dynamics of reward processing.


2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Leonard ◽  
N. Ferjan Ramirez ◽  
C. Torres ◽  
M. Hatrak ◽  
R. Mayberry ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew G. Wisniewski ◽  
Barbara A. Church ◽  
Estella H. Liu ◽  
Eduardo Mercado

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph Adam ◽  
Selas Jennings ◽  
Thamar Bovendeerdt ◽  
Pascal Van Gerven ◽  
Petra Hurks

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hanne Schevernels ◽  
Ruth Krebs ◽  
Liesbet Van der Borght ◽  
Carsten Boehler

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document