A Standardized Method for Vertical Elutriator Cotton Dust Sampling

1982 ◽  
pp. 85-103
Author(s):  
ANN L. WALKER ◽  
ELLIS E. PARDUE
AIHAJ ◽  
1979 ◽  
Vol 40 (7) ◽  
pp. 578-587 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. P. HERSH ◽  
R. E. FORNES ◽  
M. ANAND
Keyword(s):  

AIHAJ ◽  
1975 ◽  
Vol 36 (6) ◽  
pp. 470-476 ◽  
Author(s):  
JOHN D. NEEFUS
Keyword(s):  

AIHAJ ◽  
1976 ◽  
Vol 37 (11) ◽  
pp. 647-654 ◽  
Author(s):  
ROBERT M. BETHEA ◽  
PHILIP R. MOREY

AIHAJ ◽  
1979 ◽  
Vol 40 (6) ◽  
pp. 535-542 ◽  
Author(s):  
KEARNY Q. ROBERT

AIHAJ ◽  
1979 ◽  
Vol 40 (11) ◽  
pp. 933-941 ◽  
Author(s):  
BENJAMIN J. CLAASSEN

AIHAJ ◽  
1977 ◽  
Vol 38 (8) ◽  
pp. 394-400 ◽  
Author(s):  
JOHN D. NEEFUS ◽  
JOHN C. LUMSDEN ◽  
MILLER T. JONES
Keyword(s):  

AIHAJ ◽  
1977 ◽  
Vol 38 (8) ◽  
pp. 387-389
Author(s):  
MOON W. SUH ◽  
JOHN D. NEEFUS

1999 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Wilder ◽  
S. Burchette ◽  
R. Turpin ◽  
M. Trespalacios ◽  
A. Mignone
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-44
Author(s):  
Vladislav Ilin

Technology in education is a global phenomenon affecting learners of all ages. The breadth and variety of available tools make it difficult to implement a standardized method for assessing the impact of technology on learning. The lack of a consensus on good and bad practices results in inconsistent application and mixed learning results.   This article takes a look at the adaptation of technology to education and examines the various tools used to enhance learning. We discuss the advantages and disadvantages of using technology, as well as review methodologies for evaluating the impact.   The essay concludes by identifying several problems with the way technology is evaluated and offers suggestions for further research to address those problems.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document