The psychotherapy relationship: Where does the alliance fit?

Author(s):  
Adam O. Horvath
2002 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan Woodhouse ◽  
Lewis Z. Schlosser ◽  
Rachel E. Crook ◽  
Daniela P. Ligiero ◽  
Charles J. Gelso

Author(s):  
Tomáš Řiháček ◽  
Jan Roubal ◽  
Katarína Motalová

Although many separate aspects of the psychotherapy relationship have been studied, including empathy, working alliance, and self-disclosure, a metaphorical approach has the potential to generate a more holistic perspective of this phenomenon. Hence, the goal of this study was to explore the nature of the psychotherapy relationship from the psychotherapists’ perspective using a metaphorical approach. In an online survey, a sample of N=373 Czech psychotherapists and counselors rated a set of relational metaphors in terms of how accurately they depicted their roles in their relationships with their clients. The single most endorsed metaphor for the practitioner’s role was a guide. Furthermore, the principal component analysis identified three relational components, namely, Mentor, Resource Supplier, and Remedy Distributor. The associations among these components and multiple practitioners’ variables, including demographic and practice-related variables and theoretical orientation, were explored. These three components represent general dimensions of the psychotherapy relationship that cut across various theoretical orientations and, thus, define psychotherapy relationships in a general sense.


1982 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 483-491 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacqueline B. Horn-George ◽  
Kenneth N. Anchor

2005 ◽  
Vol 12 (6) ◽  
pp. 443-454 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Jill Clemence ◽  
Mark J. Hilsenroth ◽  
Steven J. Ackerman ◽  
Carla G. Strassle ◽  
Leonard Handler

1968 ◽  
Vol 38 (3) ◽  
pp. 482-492 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter E. Nathan ◽  
Stuart Smith ◽  
A. Michael Rossi

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document