Counseling psychology and clinical psychology: Some preliminary comparative data.

1986 ◽  
Vol 41 (5) ◽  
pp. 581-582 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Edward Watkins ◽  
Frederick G. Lopez ◽  
Vicki L. Campbell ◽  
Catherine D. Himmell
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Psychology ◽  
Counseling Psychology ◽  
Comparative Data

A Time for Change Implications of the CRCC Demographic Data for Rehabilitation Curriculum

1978 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 36-40
Author(s):  
Roger H. Livingston
Keyword(s):  
Graduate Education ◽  
Clinical Psychology ◽  
Counseling Psychology ◽  
Rehabilitation Counseling ◽  
Demographic Data ◽  
Rehabilitation Counselors ◽  
Extensive Data ◽  
Service Training ◽  
Rehabilitation Professional ◽  
Certified Rehabilitation Counselors

A Time for Change?Since mid-1975, extensive data has been collected on individuals seeking to become Certified Rehabilitation Counselors. Examining the data on “counselors” suggests that performaooe on the Field Review is below average in some situations. Graduates of rehabilitation counseling programs tend to score higher than most other graduate majors, such as counseling psychology or clinical psychology. The results suggest steps should be taken to strengthen training for the rehabilitation professional in terms of graduate education, RCEP, and in-service training.

Clinical psychology and counseling psychology: On similarities and differences revisited.

1987 ◽  
Vol 18 (5) ◽  
pp. 530-535 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Edward Watkins ◽  
Lawrence J. Schneider ◽  
J. Hap Cox ◽  
Julie A. Reinberg
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Psychology ◽  
Counseling Psychology ◽  
Similarities And Differences

PREDOCTORAL PSYCHOLOGY INTERN SELECTION: DOES PROGRAM TYPE MAKE A DIFFERENCE?

2003 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 313-321 ◽  
Author(s):  
Harvey L. Gayer ◽  
Michael B. Brown ◽  
Betty E. Gridley ◽  
James H. Treloar
Keyword(s):  
School Psychology ◽  
Clinical Psychology ◽  
Counseling Psychology ◽  
Selection Process ◽  
Doctoral Program ◽  
Psychology Students ◽  
Psychology Programs ◽  
Program Type ◽  
Psychology Program ◽  
Clinical Psychology Program

The purpose of this study was to determine whether or not the type of program (school psychology, clinical psychology or counseling psychology) is a factor in the predoctoral psychology internship selection process. Simulated application materials describing a prospective intern, identical in all respects except for the doctoral program type, were randomly sent to 535 directors of Association of Psychology Postdoctoral and Internship Centers (APPIC) internship sites. One-third of the sites each received application materials that indicated that the student's training was in an APA-accredited clinical psychology program, an APA-accred- ited counseling psychology program, or an APA-accredited school psychology program. Internship directors or intern selection committee members from 302 APPIC-listed internship sites responded, resulting in a 58% response rate.There is a pattern of greater acceptance for students from clinical psychology programs, with students from counseling psychology programs accepted somewhat less frequently, and stu- dents from school psychology programs being most often rejected. The results suggest that internship selectors may use a judgment heuristic that clinical psychology students are more suited to internships than are counseling and – especially – school psychology students during initial screening of internship applicants, even though there is no empirical evidence to support the heuristic. Internship selectors are advised to become more aware of potential biases toward students from counseling and school psychology programs.

Research Productivity in Counseling Psychology

2005 ◽  
Vol 33 (5) ◽  
pp. 709-728 ◽  
Author(s):  
Walter C. Buboltz ◽  
Steve M. Jenkins ◽  
Adrian Thomas ◽  
Lori D. Lindley ◽  
Jonathan P. Schwartz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cultural Diversity ◽  
Ethnic Minority ◽  
Clinical Psychology ◽  
Multicultural Counseling ◽  
Research Productivity ◽  
Counseling Psychology ◽  
Institutional Research ◽  
Vocational Behavior ◽  
Two Factors

This article is an update and review of institutional research productivity in counseling psychology. Institutional research productivity is assessed by totaling credits for articles published from 1993 to 2002 in the following journals: Journal of Counseling Psychology, The Counseling Psychologist, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, Journal of Vocational Behavior, Journal of Counseling and Development, Journal of Multicultural Counseling and Development , and Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology . Results show that the rankings of many programs have remained fairly stable over the years, while others have substantially changed. Additionally, two factors were found to represent the research productivity of institutions in the field. These results are discussed in terms of the identity of counseling psychology and research productivity.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document