Public policy and private prejudice: Psychology and law on gay rights.

1989 ◽  
Vol 44 (6) ◽  
pp. 933-940 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gary B. Melton
2021 ◽  
pp. 43-70
Author(s):  
R. Barry Ruback

Chapter 3 begins with an overview of the law in Pennsylvania regarding economic sanctions. It then provides an overview of the research that my students and I conducted in Pennsylvania, research that combines perspectives from criminology, psychology, and law. It also discusses the need for and use of multiple research methods and multiple levels of analyses in addressing issues that affect public policy. The rationale for this multiplistic approach is that consistent findings across studies, despite the different strengths and weaknesses of the different methods, indicate that those findings are probably valid. The research used state-wide data from courts, data from individual counties for both adult and juvenile offenders, and surveys of victims, offenders, and judges. The chapter then discusses three studies of economic sanctions based on statewide data or on data from multiple counties, which together provide broad descriptive information about how economic sanctions are handled in different parts of the state.


2018 ◽  
pp. 178-206
Author(s):  
Jeremiah J. Garretson

Upwards of 80% of all Americans know LGBTQ people and those that do not likely see them on television. If these are the root causes of LGBTQ rights support, then why have gay rights advanced so little in Congress and the States? The explanation comes from the theory of motivated reasoning---those with a strongly held political ideology will resist attitudinal change if it contradicts that ideology. I show that strong conservatives are largely immune to the contact effects demonstrated in the last chapter and present an experiment that shows that exposure to Ellen DeGeneres, a lesbian comedienne, can lower support for gay rights among political conservatives if she is presented in context that makes politics and political ideology more salient for people. For the strongest ideologues, exposure to LGBTQs polarizes instead of liberalizes attitudes. Since most Republican policy-makers are strong conservatives, this explains why public policy now lags public opinion on LGBTQ rights.


ASHA Leader ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 17 (15) ◽  
pp. 23-23
Author(s):  
George Lyons
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document