The Differentiation of Self Inventory: Development and initial validation.

1998 ◽  
Vol 45 (3) ◽  
pp. 235-246 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth A. Skowron ◽  
Myrna L. Friedlander
2010 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 460-471 ◽  
Author(s):  
ANDERS BROSTRÖM ◽  
MARTIN ULANDER ◽  
PER NILSEN ◽  
EVA SVANBORG ◽  
KRISTOFER FRANZÉN ÅRESTEDT

2017 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 144-154 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica Lampis ◽  
Alessandra Busonera ◽  
Stefania Cataudella ◽  
Marco Tommasi ◽  
Elizabeth A. Skowron

2015 ◽  
Vol 37 (2) ◽  
pp. 101-112 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Rico Drake ◽  
Nancy L. Murdock ◽  
Jacob M. Marszalek ◽  
Carolyn E. Barber

Author(s):  
Kleanthis Neophytou ◽  
Maria L. Schweer-Collins ◽  
Martiño Rodríguez-González ◽  
Rafael Jódar ◽  
Elizabeth A. Skowron

2016 ◽  
Vol 245 ◽  
pp. 443-450 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samuel Justin Sinclair ◽  
Michael J. Roche ◽  
Christina Temes ◽  
Christina Massey ◽  
Wei-Jean Chung ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benedict Guzman Antazo

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties and cross-cultural validity of the Differentiation of Self Inventory-Revised (Skowron & Schmitt, 2003) and Mental Health Inventory-18 (Veit & Ware, 1983) and to determine whether the Bowenian construct of differentiation could predict general mental health. In a sample of 322 Filipino adults, exploratory factor analyses and regression analyses were performed to determine the construct validity and strength of associations between the two concepts. Results of the EFA suggested a new three-factor model (3F-DSI-R) for the DSI-R while supporting the original two-factor model of the MHI-18. Regression analyses indicated that self-differentiation and its dimensions are significant predictors of mental health. Findings suggest that highly differentiated individuals tend to display better overall mental health. Lastly, implications for theory, practice, and directions for future research are discussed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document