Supplemental Material for Babies in Traffic: Infant Vocalizations and Listener Sex Modulate Auditory Motion Perception

2014 ◽  
Vol 40 (2) ◽  
pp. 775-783 ◽  
Author(s):  
John G. Neuhoff ◽  
Grace R. Hamilton ◽  
Amanda L. Gittleson ◽  
Adolfo Mejia

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (13) ◽  
pp. R775-R778
Author(s):  
Nathan Van der Stoep ◽  
David Alais

2017 ◽  
Vol 284 (1858) ◽  
pp. 20170673 ◽  
Author(s):  
Irene Senna ◽  
Cesare V. Parise ◽  
Marc O. Ernst

Unlike vision, the mechanisms underlying auditory motion perception are poorly understood. Here we describe an auditory motion illusion revealing a novel cue to auditory speed perception: the temporal frequency of amplitude modulation (AM-frequency), typical for rattling sounds. Naturally, corrugated objects sliding across each other generate rattling sounds whose AM-frequency tends to directly correlate with speed. We found that AM-frequency modulates auditory speed perception in a highly systematic fashion: moving sounds with higher AM-frequency are perceived as moving faster than sounds with lower AM-frequency. Even more interestingly, sounds with higher AM-frequency also induce stronger motion aftereffects. This reveals the existence of specialized neural mechanisms for auditory motion perception, which are sensitive to AM-frequency. Thus, in spatial hearing, the brain successfully capitalizes on the AM-frequency of rattling sounds to estimate the speed of moving objects. This tightly parallels previous findings in motion vision, where spatio-temporal frequency of moving displays systematically affects both speed perception and the magnitude of the motion aftereffects. Such an analogy with vision suggests that motion detection may rely on canonical computations, with similar neural mechanisms shared across the different modalities.


2016 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 285-298 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cédric Camier ◽  
Julien Boissinot ◽  
Catherine Guastavino

Perception ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 47 (12) ◽  
pp. 1179-1195 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julián Villegas ◽  
Naoki Fukasawa

Changes in frequency such as those found in Risset tones have been associated with moving sound sources in the vertical plane (Pratt effect) and the horizontal plane (Doppler illusion). We investigated the reported origin and motion of unspatialized Risset tones presented monotically and diotically, and Risset tones simulated to be in the sagittal or coronal plane, approaching or receding, from above or horizontally. Independent of the artificial spatialization used (none, spatializing frequency components collectively or individually, elevated or not), upward glissandi were more likely to be judged as approaching than receding, and downward glissandi as receding than approaching, in most cases from the horizon. Glissandi associations with horizontal movements were more common in stimuli simulated on the sagittal plane than in stimuli simulated on the coronal plane. These findings suggest that the Doppler illusion is stronger than the Pratt effect, at least for Risset tones presented over headphones and simulated to be in the sagittal plane. These findings may contribute to better understanding of the association between auditory motion perception and changes in frequency.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. e17499 ◽  
Author(s):  
Souta Hidaka ◽  
Wataru Teramoto ◽  
Yoichi Sugita ◽  
Yuko Manaka ◽  
Shuichi Sakamoto ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 87-99 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco Hirnstein ◽  
Markus Hausmann ◽  
Jörg Lewald

i-Perception ◽  
10.1068/ic890 ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 2 (8) ◽  
pp. 890-890
Author(s):  
Souta Hidaka ◽  
Wataru Teramoto ◽  
Yoichi Sugita ◽  
Yuko Manaka ◽  
Shuichi Sakamoto ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document