The development of action planning in a joint action context.

2016 ◽  
Vol 52 (7) ◽  
pp. 1052-1063 ◽  
Author(s):  
Markus Paulus
2019 ◽  
Vol 131 ◽  
pp. 73-83 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dimitrios Kourtis ◽  
Mateusz Woźniak ◽  
Natalie Sebanz ◽  
Günther Knoblich
Keyword(s):  

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Michael ◽  
Yahui Liang ◽  
Thomas Wolf ◽  
Georgina Török ◽  
Marcell Székely

In order to sustain cooperation, it is important that we have a sense that the distribution of efforts is fair. But how proficient are we at comparing our effort relative to that of others? Does the perception of our effort differ in individual and joint action contexts? To address these questions, we asked participants to squeeze a hand dynamometer at varying degrees of force to meet three target levels alone and with a partner. The results do not reveal a significant difference in the perception of effort between the two conditions. However, participants’ estimation of their effort skewed towards half when they made partial contribution to the target and this effect was more pronounced in the joint action. Taken together, the findings suggest that participants might have applied heuristics when perceiving their effort and in addition, expected fairness in the effortcontribution in a joint action context.


2013 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-42 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Kourtis ◽  
N. Sebanz ◽  
G. Knoblich
Keyword(s):  

2014 ◽  
Vol 26 (10) ◽  
pp. 2275-2286 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dimitrios Kourtis ◽  
Günther Knoblich ◽  
Mateusz Woźniak ◽  
Natalie Sebanz

We investigated whether people take into account an interaction partner's attentional focus and whether they represent in advance their partner's part of the task when planning to engage in a synchronous joint action. The experiment involved two participants planning and performing joint actions (i.e., synchronously lifting and clinking glasses), unimanual individual actions (i.e., lifting and moving a glass as if clinking with another person), and bimanual individual actions. EEG was recorded from one of the participants. We employed a choice reaction paradigm where a visual cue indicated the type of action to be planned, followed 1.5 sec later by a visual go stimulus, prompting the participants to act. We studied attention allocation processes by examining two lateralized EEG components, namely the anterior directing attention negativity and the late directing attention positivity. Action planning processes were examined using the late contingent negative variation and the movement-related potential. The results show that early stages of joint action planning involve dividing attention between locations in space relevant for one's own part of the joint action and locations relevant for one's partner's part of the joint action. At later stages of joint action planning, participants represented in advance their partner's upcoming action in addition to their own action, although not at an effector-specific level. Our study provides electrophysiological evidence supporting the operation of attention sharing processes and predictive self/other action representation during the planning phase of a synchronous joint task.


2020 ◽  
Vol 43 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philip Pettit

Abstract Michael Tomasello explains the human sense of obligation by the role it plays in negotiating practices of acting jointly and the commitments they underwrite. He draws in his work on two models of joint action, one from Michael Bratman, the other from Margaret Gilbert. But Bratman's makes the explanation too difficult to succeed, and Gilbert's makes it too easy.


2020 ◽  
Vol 43 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giovanni Pezzulo ◽  
Laura Barca ◽  
Domenico Maisto ◽  
Francesco Donnarumma

Abstract We consider the ways humans engage in social epistemic actions, to guide each other's attention, prediction, and learning processes towards salient information, at the timescale of online social interaction and joint action. This parallels the active guidance of other's attention, prediction, and learning processes at the longer timescale of niche construction and cultural practices, as discussed in the target article.


2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew Kenning ◽  
J. Scott Jordan ◽  
Cooper Cutting ◽  
Jim Clinton ◽  
Justin Durtschi

2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pamela Baess ◽  
Wolfgang Prinz
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document