Education: Changes are coming soon in academic tenure system

1999 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bridget Murray ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 85-98 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael S McPherson ◽  
Morton Owen Schapiro

The system of academic tenure has come under increasing scrutiny. The authors provide a brief review of the tenure literature, discuss some recent tenure controversies, and present basic data on the percentage of faculty subject to the tenure system. The issue of tenure is discussed in terms of how the authority necessary to run a college or university is delegated. The authors believe that this perspective sheds light on some underlying reasons for why tenure differs from other forms of labor contracting and on the reasons for the relative importance of the tenure system in different parts of higher education.


2016 ◽  
Vol 43 (3) ◽  
pp. 405-428 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen M. Cardozo

This article analyzes the neoliberal turn to contingent labor in academe, specifically the development of a ‘teaching-only’ sector, through the lens of feminist, interdisciplinary and intersectional studies of care work. Integrating discourses on faculty contingency and diversity with care scholarship reveals that the construction of a casualized and predominantly female teaching class in higher education follows longstanding patterns of devaluing socially reproductive work under capitalism. The devaluation of care may also have a disparate impact on the advancement of women within the tenure system. In short, academic labor issues are also diversity issues. To re-value those who care, intersectional alliances must be forged not only between faculty sectors, but also among faculty, care workers in other industries, and members of society who benefit from caring labor.


2006 ◽  
Vol 29 (6) ◽  
pp. 578-579
Author(s):  
Gary Greenberg ◽  
Dorothy K. Billings

We do not dispute the findings of Ceci et al.'s study, though they are based on survey research which does not always reflect real-life experiences. We report on cases we have defended on the basis of the tenure system, few of which mirror the situations reported in the target article. We end with a strong defense of the tenure system in the modern university.


1982 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 299-307
Author(s):  
geoffrey Caston
Keyword(s):  

1983 ◽  
Vol 4 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 163-184 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael S. McPherson ◽  
Gordon C. Winston
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document