Young researchers seek guidance in grant-writing

1997 ◽  
Author(s):  
Beth Azar
2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 11021-11021
Author(s):  
Joan B. Fowler ◽  
Bryan Carson Taylor ◽  
Susan H. Gitzinger ◽  
Vanessa Carranza

11021 Background: Advancing the fight against cancer involves many types of research across different disciplines and professions, from PhD-trained scientists to medical oncology physicians. The IOYIF is a competitive academic research program where oncology junior faculty, clinical and post-doctoral fellows who are pursuing a career in academic research in IO are invited to submit an abstract of their unpublished, original research to a panel of expert judges for assessment. Methods: Performance and confidence change were objectively assessed by analyzing pre- and post-test results before and after the presentation of research. Statistical testing between pre- and post-participation were conducted via chi square analysis with a priori significance set at 0.05. Results: Participants experienced an improvement in mean abstract score following participation in the forum. The mean abstract score improvement was statistically significant for All Participants ( P< 0.001) and all sub-groups ( P< 0.001), with the sole exception of Clinician Scientists. Overall, PhD/Postdoctoral Research participants demonstrated the most improvement. The mean abstract score improvement was statistically significant for those who attended presentation coaching ( P< 0.001) as well as for those that did not ( P= 0.001); the magnitude of improvement was greater among those who attended coaching. Participant self-reported mean confidence scores increased with statistical significance from pre- to post-participation in the forum ( P< 0.001); this increase was noted across all participants and all sub-groups, and was observed in relation to both presentation skills and research defense. Young Investigators reported that lack of experience with grant writing is the most significant barrier they face to obtaining grant funding; they also listed lack of mentorship/guidance in publishing as a prominent barrier. Conclusions: This analysis demonstrates that an IO research forum designed for young investigators can improve the performance and confidence of these scientists. These findings highlight the robust, multifaceted impact of the IOYIF on advancing the professional development of the next generation of IO researchers. Identification of barriers demonstrates the tangible value of the IOYIF in providing needed mentorship to further research efforts, deliver axioms of grant writing guidance, and bridge the gap young researchers face in obtaining funding and publishing their work.


2010 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-24
Author(s):  
Nicole M. Mancini

Abstract At first, grant writing may look like a daunting task. You may ask yourself, “Is it really worth the time and effort?” With today's economic situation, teachers and therapists need ways to supplement their programs and grants provide such an opportunity. However, many of us do not know how to get started. After a few experiences and many lessons learned, I have come to enjoy researching and writing grants to supplement my students' learning. It is well worth the time and effort. This article provides information about a personal journey, lessons learned, and resources to get you started.


PsycCRITIQUES ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 51 (47) ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul J. Silvia
Keyword(s):  

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kirsten Weir
Keyword(s):  

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Erin C. Pischke ◽  
Lucía Pérez Volkow ◽  
Mayra Fragoso-Medina ◽  
Laura Aguirre franco

In November 2016, a group of students from the Americas participated in an Inter-American Institute for Global Change Researchfunded two-week course organized by professors from the National Autonomous University of Mexico. The aim was to teach students and young researchers how to collaborate with non-scientists to conduct socioecological systems research in a transdisciplinary manner. This article will review the benefits as well as the challenges to doing so. It concludes with recommendations that other research teams can follow when conducting similar research that crosses disciplinary and international borders.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document