Standards for Specialty Board Certification by the American Board of Professional Psychology

2007 ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 34 (11) ◽  
pp. 525-530 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. U. Lehmann ◽  
V. Shorte ◽  
A. V. Gundlapalli

2015 ◽  
Vol 79 (5) ◽  
pp. 493-498 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew J. Pakchoian ◽  
Didem Dagdeviren ◽  
Jessica Kilham ◽  
Mina Mahdian ◽  
Alan Lurie ◽  
...  

1969 ◽  
Vol 44 (10) ◽  
pp. 951-4 ◽  
Author(s):  
J T Foster ◽  
S Abrahamson ◽  
S Lass ◽  
R Girard ◽  
R Garris

2017 ◽  
Vol 117 (4) ◽  
pp. 268 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Michael Wieting ◽  
Jeffrey L. Weaver ◽  
Jeffrey A. Kramer ◽  
Leo Morales-Egizi

2019 ◽  
Vol 105 (2) ◽  
pp. 33-41
Author(s):  
Michael L. Farrell

ABSTRACT State medical board action that is deemed a restriction by an ABMS specialty board can result in a loss of board certification, impacting a physician's ability to practice, and frustrating a medical board's efforts to rehabilitate the physician and improve the quality of care provided to patients. State medical boards have difficulty predicting what types of actions constitute a restriction by a specialty board and imposing appropriate discipline because specialty boards use varying criteria to evaluate state medical board action. ABMS specialty boards experience frustration of their own when attempting to interpret actions from 70 separate state medical boards, each governed by its own laws and using its own nomenclature. This article summarizes the inconsistency of both specialty boards and state medical boards, describes the efforts to resolve this issue, and proposes a series of steps that will bring a higher degree of predictability to this process and meet the needs of all stakeholders.


Author(s):  
Nicholas Siegel ◽  
Hillary Jenny ◽  
Karan Chopra ◽  
Robin Yang

Abstract Background The utilization of social media is growing among academic and private practice plastic surgeons. Objectives The aim of this study was to determine training backgrounds and board certification of medical professionals through the use of plastic surgery-related hashtags on a single social media platform, Instagram. Methods Instagram was queried with 15 plastic surgery–related hashtags. Only the top 50 posts of each hashtag were analyzed at a single time point and international accounts were excluded. Data collected included account owner, degree, medical specialty, board certification, and type of post. Results The study sample consisted of 750 posts from an Instagram query in January 2019. Medical professionals accounted for 75% (n = 561) of posts. Board-certified physicians accounted for 56% (n = 420) of posts. Of the physician posters, 51% (n = 230) were trained in plastic surgery, 30% (n = 133) in otolaryngology, and 19% (n = 87) in other specialties. Facial rejuvenation content was more likely to be posted by otolaryngologists rather than plastic surgeons (P ≤ 0.001), whereas body-contouring procedures were more likely to be posted by plastic surgeons. Nonsurgical procedures and injectables were more likely to be posted by nonphysicians (P ≤ 0.001). Physicians without training in plastic surgery or otolaryngology were also more likely to post nonsurgical procedure–related hashtags (P ≤ 0.001). Conclusions Medical professionals publish the majority of plastic surgery–related posts on Instagram; however, the utilization of plastic surgery hashtags by other specialties may be confusing or misleading to social media users who are unaware of interdisciplinary training differences.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document