body contouring
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

798
(FIVE YEARS 232)

H-INDEX

40
(FIVE YEARS 5)

2022 ◽  
Vol 270 ◽  
pp. 348-358
Author(s):  
Adrienne N. Christopher ◽  
Martin P Morris ◽  
Viren Patel ◽  
Robyn B. Broach ◽  
John P. Fischer

Lipedema ◽  
2022 ◽  
pp. 177-198
Author(s):  
Zaher Jandali ◽  
Benedikt Merwart ◽  
Lucian Jiga

Author(s):  
Dirk F. Richter ◽  
Tobias Heuft
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_9) ◽  
Author(s):  
Piriyah Sinclair ◽  
Guy Vijgen ◽  
Edo Aarts ◽  
Yves Van Nieuwenhove ◽  
Almantas Maleckas

Abstract Background Europe consists of 51 independent countries. Variation in healthcare regulations results in differing challenges faced by patients and professionals. The obesity pandemic has multiple health, economic and social implications. However, metabolic surgery is not universally accessible, with significant variations in its provision. This study aimed to gain insight into compliance with international guidelines; the accessibility and barriers to surgery; patient pathways and qualitor indicators of both metabolic and body contouring surgery after weight loss in different European countries. Methods This study was initiated during the European Obesity Academy (EOA). Expert representatives in the metabolic field from all 51 European countries were sent a novel, 37-item, electronic self-administered online questionnaire on their data and experiences from the previous year exploring accessibility to and quality indicators for metabolic surgery and body contouring surgery after weight loss. The survey tool was peer-reviewed by experienced researchers and piloted by fifteen experienced researchers with a spread of seniority and specialty. Content and face validity were ensured by peer-review and the piloting process. 45 completed responses were collected.  Results 68% of countries had eligibility criteria for metabolic surgery; 59% adhered to these. 46% had reimbursement criteria for metabolic surgery. 41% had eligibility criteria for plastic surgery and 31% reimbursement criteria. Average tariffs for a metabolic procedure varied (€800-€ 16000). MDTs were mandated in 78%, with team members varying significantly. Referral practises differed. In 45% metabolic surgery is performed by pure metabolic surgeons. 23% had a metabolic training program. Access to metabolic surgery was rated poor/ very poor in 33%. 35% had a bariatric registry. 24% required a minimum procedure number for metabolic centres; varying from 25 to 200 procedures. Conclusions This is the first study to describe accessibility and quality data on metabolic and body contouring surgery from most European countries. There are myriad differences between European countries in terms of accessibility to metabolic surgery. Lack of funding, education and structure fuels this disparity. We hope this study will impact standardisation of access and quality indicators for metabolic and body contouring surgery across European countries, as well as be a springboard for further evaluation of international metabolic surgery practices.


2021 ◽  
pp. 541-552
Author(s):  
Mark S. Nestor ◽  
Daniel Fischer ◽  
David Arnold ◽  
Taraneh Matin ◽  
Jessica L. Jones

Author(s):  
David M Turer ◽  
Al Aly

Abstract Seromas are a common complication in plastic surgery. In this article we describe our approach to the prevention and treatment of seromas and include a discussion of the evolution of our techniques. We provide specific technical details for many body contouring operations, including abdominoplasty, belt lipectomy, brachioplasty, and thighplasty. Many of our techniques question the traditional dictums of plastic surgery and we hope to encourage others to consider novel techniques for the treatment and prevention of seromas.


2021 ◽  
pp. 074880682110589
Author(s):  
Alannah L. Phelan ◽  
Phoebe McAuliffe ◽  
Mark G. Albert

Brachioplasty is a popular body contouring surgery which treats upper arm deformity related to both aging and massive weight loss. Demand for brachioplasty is growing, as the volume of bariatric surgery performed in the United States has doubled in the last decade.1 Local anesthesia offers multiple benefits for both patients and providers: it avoids anesthetic risks and anesthesia costs, decreases operating room time, and facilitates a more rapid recovery for patients. Brachioplasty is typically performed under general anesthesia or moderate sedation; this study details a successful technique to perform brachioplasty under wide-awake local anesthesia with high patient satisfaction and an excellent safety profile.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document