Judgment and Decision Making in Sport and Exercise

UK Trainee Sport and Exercise Psychologists’ Perspectives on Developing Professional Judgment and Decision-Making Expertise During Training

The Sport Psychologist ◽

10.1123/tsp.2018-0112 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 33 (4) ◽

pp. 334-343

Author(s):

Michelle Smith ◽

Hayley E. McEwan ◽

David Tod ◽

Amanda Martindale

Keyword(s):

Decision Making ◽

Qualitative Data ◽

Judgment And Decision Making ◽

Professional Judgment ◽

Data Set ◽

Theoretical Concepts ◽

Analytical Reasoning ◽

British Psychological Society ◽

Sport And Exercise ◽

Use Of Knowledge

The research team explored UK trainee sport and exercise psychologists’ perspectives on developing professional-judgment and decision-making (PJDM) expertise during their British Psychological Society Qualification in Sport and Exercise Psychology (Stage 2). An assorted analysis approach was adopted to combine an existing longitudinal qualitative data set with the collection and analysis of a new qualitative data set. Participants (1 female, 6 male) were interviewed 4 times over a 3-yr training period, at minimum yearly intervals. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and reflexive thematic analysis applied to transcripts using the theoretical concepts of PJDM. Experience, analytical reasoning, and observation of other practitioners’ practice was useful for developing PJDM expertise. PJDM expertise might be optimized through the use of knowledge-elicitation principles. For example, supervisors could embed critical cues in the anecdotes they share to expand the experience base that trainees can draw from when making decisions.