Survey Results of the Task Force on Internship and Postdoctoral Training in Psychology of Women

1997 ◽  
Author(s):  
Natalie Porter ◽  
Pam Remer ◽  
Susanne Siehnhold
2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan Yoder ◽  
Olga Favreau ◽  
Susan Basow ◽  
Joan Chrisler ◽  
Bonnie Moradi ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kaylee Pruski ◽  
Ben Marwick ◽  
Eloise Potter ◽  
Raelee Hampton ◽  
Li-Ying Wang

In the spring of 2018, the Society for American Archaeology (SAA) initiated the process of updating and revising the SAA Principles of Archaeological Ethics. As part of this process, the SAA created the Task Force on Revising the SAA Principles of Archaeological Ethics: Stage Two (TF-2), which would collect, organize, and analyze results from a survey (see Rakita and Gordon, this issue, for more details about the work of TF-2). This survey was available online between April and June of 2020 and was open to SAA members and non-members. Consisting of 31 questions, the survey received responses from 1,542 people (including 1,112 SAA members). A key objective was to gauge reactions and attitudes of respondents toward the current SAA Principles of Archaeological Ethics. This article reports the survey results relevant to those principles, which can be found at https://www.saa.org/career-practice/ethics-in-professional-archaeology and which are reprinted in this issue of the Record. We first summarize the respondents’ demographics, and how they are using the principles. We then summarize reactions to each of the nine principles and responses to questions about how the principles address situations and concerns. These data provide an indication of the overall level of satisfaction with the current SAA Principles of Archaeological Ethics. Finally, we conclude with some guidance for considering future revisions of the principles.


1978 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan McCandless ◽  
◽  
Wendy McKenna ◽  
Sarah Lawrence ◽  
Susan R. Sacks ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. bmjstel-2021-000897
Author(s):  
Joseph Sleiman ◽  
David J Savage ◽  
Benjamin Switzer ◽  
Colleen Y Colbert ◽  
Cory Chevalier ◽  
...  

BackgroundBreaking bad news (BBN) is a critically important skill set for residents. Limited formal supervision and unpredictable timing of bad news delivery serve as barriers to the exchange of meaningful feedback.Purpose of studyThe goal of this educational innovation was to improve internal medicine residents’ communication skills during challenging BBN encounters. A formal BBN training programme and innovative on-demand task force were part of this two-phase project.Study designInternal medicine residents at a large academic medical centre participated in an interactive workshop focused on BBN. Workshop survey results served as a needs assessment for the development of a novel resident-led BBN task force. The task force was created to provide observations at the bedside and feedback after BBN encounters. Training of task force members incorporated video triggers and a feedback checklist. Inter-rater reliability was analysed prior to field testing, which provided data on real-world implementation challenges.Results148 residents were trained during the 2-hour communications skills workshop. Based on survey results, 73% (108 of 148) of the residents indicated enhanced confidence in BBN after participation. Field testing of the task force on a hospital ward revealed potential workflow barriers for residents requesting observations and prompted troubleshooting. Solutions were implemented based on field testing results.ConclusionsA trainee-led BBN task force and communication skills workshop is offered as an innovative model for improving residents’ interpersonal and communication skills in BBN. We believe the model is both sustainable and reproducible. Lessons learnt are offered to aid in implementation in other settings.


2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (5) ◽  
pp. e200422
Author(s):  
Alexandra Foust ◽  
Patrick R. Johnston ◽  
Joanna Kasznia-Brown ◽  
Winnie C. Chu ◽  
Pilar Garcia-Pena ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document