Reward Value and Reward Timing are Not Independent

2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tiffany Galtress ◽  
Kimberly Kirkpatrick
Keyword(s):  
iScience ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 102763
Author(s):  
Henrietta Bolló ◽  
Orsolya Kiss ◽  
Anna Kis ◽  
József Topál
Keyword(s):  

2016 ◽  
Vol 23 (6) ◽  
pp. 289-302 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alice C. Mosberger ◽  
Larissa de Clauser ◽  
Hansjörg Kasper ◽  
Martin E. Schwab

1999 ◽  
Vol 84 (1) ◽  
pp. 323-328 ◽  
Author(s):  
Harvard L. Armus

This study tested whether a distinctive secondary rewarding stimulus (a black or a white goal box) of a Y-maze associated with a difficult response (running “uphill”) would be preferred to the box associated with an easy response (running on a horizontal plane). If so, it would indicate that secondary reward value was positively related to response difficulty in organisms having little in the way of cultural conditioning, namely, laboratory rats. The data, however, showed no such preference.


Author(s):  
Marcos Nadal ◽  
Esther Ureña

This article reviews the history of empirical aesthetics since its foundation by Fechner in 1876 to Berlyne’s new empirical aesthetics in the 1970s. The authors explain why and how Fechner founded the field, and how Wundt and Müller’s students continued his work in the early 20th century. In the United States, empirical aesthetics flourished as part of American functional psychology at first, and later as part of behaviorists’ interest in reward value. The heyday of behaviorism was also a golden age for the development of all sorts of tests for artistic and aesthetic aptitudes. The authors end the article by covering the contributions of Gestalt psychology and Berlyne’s motivational theory to empirical aesthetics.


PLoS Biology ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 16 (9) ◽  
pp. e2004015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian Lee ◽  
Ronny N. Gentry ◽  
Gregory B. Bissonette ◽  
Rae J. Herman ◽  
John J. Mallon ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document