Verbal conditioning of two response classes

1960 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. D. Matarazzo
Keyword(s):  
1970 ◽  
Vol 35 (1, Pt.1) ◽  
pp. 70-78 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul S. Lapuc ◽  
Morton G. Harmatz

1970 ◽  
Vol 83 (3, Pt.1) ◽  
pp. 431-434
Author(s):  
Theodore R. Dixon ◽  
Alan E. Moulton

2005 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 137-146 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph Cautilli ◽  
T. Chris Riley-Tillman ◽  
Saul Axelrod ◽  
Philip Hineline

1959 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
pp. 79
Author(s):  
MAURICE W. SULLIVAN
Keyword(s):  

1964 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 523-530 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Marlowe ◽  
Russell S. Beecher ◽  
Jonathan B. Cook ◽  
Anthony N. Doob

This study investigated the relationship of approval motivation to verbal conditioning under vicarious reinforcement. Fifteen college students completed 20 operant trials in a sentence construction task. They then observed E reinforce a “programmed” confederate who emitted critical responses according to a typical acquisition curve. Fifteen control Ss observed identical confederate behavior with the reinforcements omitted. An additional 15 control Ss did not receive the observation phase. All Ss then were given 40 nonreinforced trials. A significant conditioning effect occurred only for Ss with high need for approval in the vicarious reinforcement condition. Results were related to previous verbal conditioning research.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document