The relationship between the need for closure and foreign-policy attitudes: Moderating effects of national attachment and threat

2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher M. Federico ◽  
Agnieszka Golec ◽  
Brad Lippmann ◽  
Damla Ergun ◽  
Jessica Dial ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Foreign Policy ◽  
Need For Closure ◽  
Moderating Effects ◽  
Policy Attitudes ◽  
National Attachment ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Foreign Policy Attitudes

Nationalism, Patriotism and Foreign Policy Attitudes among Chinese University Students

2013 ◽  
Vol 216 ◽  
pp. 1045-1063 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elina Sinkkonen
Keyword(s):  
Foreign Policy ◽  
University Students ◽  
Policy Preferences ◽  
Linear Regression Models ◽  
Explanatory Factors ◽  
Chinese University ◽  
Policy Attitudes ◽  
Chinese University Students ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Foreign Policy Attitudes

AbstractDoes empirical evidence support treating “nationalism” and “patriotism” as separate concepts in China and is there a relationship between strong nationalist/patriotic attitudes and foreign policy preferences? To analyse the construction of Chinese national identity, Chinese university students (N = 1346) took part in a survey in Beijing in spring 2007. The data supported the assumption of a conceptual separation between nationalism and patriotism. CCP members and students from rural backgrounds were more nationalistic than non-members and students with urban upbringings. Moreover, nationalism had a stronger link to foreign policy preferences than patriotism, and respondents with a greater degree of nationalism were less likely to favour international cooperation and more likely to prefer protectionist policies. The associations of nationalism and patriotism with foreign policy attitudes, and the contribution of other potential explanatory factors to the relationship between nationalism, patriotism and policy attitudes were explored with linear regression models.

In the Shadow of Conflict: How Emotions, Threat Perceptions and Victimization Influence Foreign Policy Attitudes

2019 ◽  
pp. 1-22
Author(s):  
A. Kupatadze ◽  
T. Zeitzoff
Keyword(s):  
Foreign Policy ◽  
Exposure To Violence ◽  
Internally Displaced ◽  
Threat Perceptions ◽  
Policy Attitudes ◽  
Direct Exposure ◽  
Stratified Sample ◽  
Differential Exposure ◽  
To Receive ◽  
Foreign Policy Attitudes

AbstractWe investigate how emotions, threat perceptions and past violence influence foreign policy attitudes via a survey experiment in Georgia. Using a stratified sample across areas with differential exposure to the conflict and the presence of internally displaced persons, we randomly assign respondents to receive emotional primes about Russian aggression in the region. We find that exposure to violence, as well as simply being primed about past Russian aggression, both increase the perceived threat from Russia, and to a lesser extent anger towards Russia. Individuals who receive the primes are more supportive of a hardline foreign policy. In contrast, we find that exposure to violence does not have a direct effect on foreign policy attitudes, but increases hardline attitudes indirectly, through increased anger and threat. Taken together our results provide evidence that reminders of past violence have different effects than direct exposure to violence on foreign policy attitudes.

The Structure of Western European Attitudes Towards Atlantic Co-operation: Implications for the Western Alliance

1987 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 457-477 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew H. Ziegler
Keyword(s):  
Factor Analysis ◽  
Foreign Policy ◽  
The West ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Single Item ◽  
Policy Attitudes ◽  
Defence Spending ◽  
Western European ◽  
Cross National ◽  
Foreign Policy Attitudes

Previous studies of Western European foreign policy attitudes rely almost exclusively on single-item measures, such as support for defence spending, support for the new missiles in Europe, opinions on NATO, and so on. This article, using a multi-country data set, aggregates several survey items and explores the manner in which Europeans structure their attitudes towards one aspect of foreign policy: Atlantic co-operation. A factor analysis uncovers two underlying conceptual dimensions: military and non-military co-operation. These dimensions provide the axes to construct a four-fold typology of viewpoints, consisting of Atlanticists, Military Allies, Dovish Partners and Isolationists. Respondents are classified within this typology, and the European-wide and cross-national distributions of opinion are presented. The highest support for Atlantic co-operation is found among the West Germans, and the lowest is found among the French.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document