Effect of hippocampal lesions and intertrial interval on single-alternation performance in the rat.

1972 ◽  
Vol 80 (3) ◽  
pp. 469-477 ◽  
Author(s):  
Don W. Walker ◽  
Linda G. Messer ◽  
Gerhard Freund ◽  
Larry W. Means
1979 ◽  
Vol 44 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1311-1316
Author(s):  
Richard J. Nicholls ◽  
Victor Duch

Four groups of rats were given single-alternation training in a runway using sucrose reward and then extinguished. Only subjects given training with a short interval (10 sec.) between rewarded and nonrewarded trials and a long interval (40 min.) between nonrewarded and rewarded trials learned patterned responding. This duplicated the results found in classical conditioning with a similar manipulation. The acquisition and extinction data led to the conclusion that intertrial interval cues can be made more important than aftereffects in producing patterning with sucrose reinforcement.


1974 ◽  
Vol 38 (1) ◽  
pp. 231-234
Author(s):  
Stephen F. Davis ◽  
Bobby R. Brown

16 female, albino rats served as Ss in an investigation of performance on single and double-alternation sequences of reward-nonreward. Ss were run in an operant conditioning chamber with a 24-hr. intenrial interval. The results indicated that Ss receiving the single-alternation reward-nonreward sequence learned to respond appropriately, i.e., fast on reward days, slow on nonreward days, while Ss run under the double-alternation sequence did not exhibit appropriate responding. The results are seen as being supportive of Capaldi's sequential hypothesis.


1969 ◽  
Vol 69 (4, Pt.1) ◽  
pp. 739-747 ◽  
Author(s):  
James E. Ackil ◽  
Roger L. Mellgren ◽  
Carl Halgren ◽  
Gabriel P. Frommer

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document