“Using 26,000 diary entries to show ovulatory changes in sexual desire and behavior”: Correction to Arslan et al. (2018).

Author(s):  
Ruben C. Arslan ◽  
Katharina M. Schilling ◽  
Tanja M. Gerlach ◽  
Lars Penke
Keyword(s):  
2019 ◽  
Vol 48 (3) ◽  
pp. 795-801 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristen P. Mark ◽  
Christine E. Leistner ◽  
Minhao Dai
Keyword(s):  

PLoS ONE ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (7) ◽  
pp. e0236134
Author(s):  
Jaroslav Flegr ◽  
Radim Kuba ◽  
Robin Kopecký

1994 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 488-504 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Farley Hurlbert ◽  
Carol Apt

Author(s):  
Lori A. Brotto ◽  
Faith Jabs ◽  
Natalie Brown ◽  
Sonia Milani ◽  
Bozena Zdaniuk

2000 ◽  
Vol 28 (6) ◽  
pp. 613-620 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer Katz ◽  
Sherry Farrow

Heterosexual individuals who engage in dyadic sex are guided by scripts that dictate expectations and behavior. In our culture, these sexual scripts are based on traditional gender roles in which women are primarily expressive and men are primarily instrumental. Drawing from self-verification theory, the authors reasoned that instrumental women and expressive men experience greater psychological discomfort with sexual interactions because they are not treated in a selfverifying manner. As predicted, women who identified as highly instrumental (but not expressive) endorsed greater sexual anxiety and less desire than either traditionally expressive feminine or androgynous women. Likewise, men who identified as highly expressive (but not instrumental) endorsed less sexual desire than androgynous men. Sociocultural influences on self-views and sexual functioning are discussed.


Author(s):  
Ruben C. Arslan ◽  
Katharina M. Schilling ◽  
Tanja M. Gerlach ◽  
Lars Penke
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document