scholarly journals Drug pipeline 2Q21—accelerated approvals to the fore

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (8) ◽  
pp. 904-905
Author(s):  
Laura DeFrancesco
Keyword(s):  
2011 ◽  
Vol 41 (16) ◽  
pp. 41
Author(s):  
BRUCE JANCIN
Keyword(s):  

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (8) ◽  
pp. 840-841
Author(s):  
Laura DeFrancesco
Keyword(s):  

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 125-125
Author(s):  
Laura DeFrancesco
Keyword(s):  

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 190-190 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura DeFrancesco
Keyword(s):  

2015 ◽  
Vol 1 (10) ◽  
pp. 877-894 ◽  
Author(s):  
Megan C. Cox ◽  
Laura M. Reese ◽  
Lissett R. Bickford ◽  
Scott S. Verbridge

2018 ◽  
Vol 292 ◽  
pp. 117-128 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey L. Evelhoch
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
M.B. Isaac ◽  
S. Vamvakas

Despite substantial advances in the understanding of central nervous system (CNS) disorders, healthcare systems worldwide face an unprecedented challenge in dealing with the unmet needs in this area (1). Meanwhile, the CNS drug pipeline looks worryingly dry. There are several reasons for this, including the obvious complexity of the CNS, a lack of interdisciplinary collaborations, increased drug development costs and the higher risk of clinical failure of CNS drugs, compared with those in other areas of drug development. The year 2016 was also disappointing in terms of failed trials of Alzheimer’ Dementia (AD) drugs.


The Lancet ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 395 (10232) ◽  
pp. 1245-1246 ◽  
Author(s):  
Asher Mullard
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document