Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease
Latest Publications


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

402
(FIVE YEARS 204)

H-INDEX

2
(FIVE YEARS 2)

Published By SERDI

2274-5807

Author(s):  
A. Shah ◽  
O. Ysea-Hill ◽  
A. Torres-Morales ◽  
C.J. Gomez ◽  
A. Castellanos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
K.I. Avgerinos ◽  
R.J. Mullins ◽  
J.M. Egan ◽  
D. Kapogiannis

BACKGROUND: Ketone bodies have been proposed as an “energy rescue” for the Alzheimer’s disease (AD) brain, which underutilizes glucose. Prior research has shown that oral ketone monoester (KME) safely induces robust ketosis in humans and has demonstrated cognitive-enhancing and pathology-reducing properties in animal models of AD. However, human evidence that KME may enhance brain ketone metabolism, improve cognitive performance and engage AD pathogenic cascades is scarce. Objectives: To investigate the effects of ketone monoester (KME) on brain metabolism, cognitive performance and AD pathogenic cascades in cognitively normal older adults with metabolic syndrome and therefore at higher risk for AD. Design: Double-blinded randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial. Setting: Clinical Unit of the National Institute on Aging, Baltimore, US. Participants: Fifty cognitively intact adults ≥ 55 years old, with metabolic syndrome. Intervention: Drinks containing 25 g of KME or isocaloric placebo consumed three times daily for 28 days. Outcomes: Primary: concentration of beta-hydroxybutyrate (BHB) in precuneus measured with Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRS). Exploratory: plasma and urine BHB, multiple brain and muscle metabolites detected with MRS, cognition assessed with the PACC and NIH toolbox, biomarkers of AD and metabolic mediators in plasma extracellular vesicles, and stool microbiome. Discussion: This is the first study to investigate the AD-biomarker and cognitive effects of KME in humans. Ketone monoester is safe, tolerable, induces robust ketosis, and animal studies indicate that it can modify AD pathology. By conducting a study of KME in a population at risk for AD, we hope to bridge the existing gap between pre-clinical evidence and the potential for brain-metabolic, pro-cognitive, and anti-Alzheimer’s effects in humans.


Author(s):  
J. Ford ◽  
D. Kafetsouli ◽  
H. Wilson ◽  
C. Udeh-Momoh ◽  
M. Politis ◽  
...  

Neuroimaging serves a variety of purposes in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and related dementias (ADRD) research - from measuring microscale neural activity at the subcellular level, to broad topological patterns seen across macroscale-brain networks, and everything in between. In vivo imaging provides insight into the brain’s structure, function, and molecular architecture across numerous scales of resolution; allowing examination of the morphological, functional, and pathological changes that occurs in patients across different AD stages (1). AD is a complex and potentially heterogenous disease, with no proven cure and no single risk factor to isolate and measure, whilst known risk factors do not fully account for the risk of developing this disease (2). Since the 1990’s, technological advancements in neuroimaging have allowed us to visualise the wide organisational structure of the brain (3) and later developments led to capturing information of brain ‘functionality’, as well as the visualisation and measurement of the aggregation and accumulation of AD-related pathology. Thus, in vivo brain imaging has and will continue to be an instrumental tool in clinical research, mainly in the pre-clinical disease stages, aimed at elucidating the biological complex processes and interactions underpinning the onset and progression of cognitive decline and dementia. The growing societal burden of AD/ADRD means that there has never been a greater need, nor a better time, to use such powerful and sensitive tools to aid our understanding of this undoubtedly complex disease. It is by consolidating and reflecting on these imaging advancements and developing long-term strategies across different disciplines, that we can move closer to our goal of dementia prevention. This short commentary will outline recent developments in neuroimaging in the field of AD and dementia by first describing the historical context of AD classification and the introduction of AD imaging biomarkers, followed by some examples of significant recent developments in neuroimaging methods and technologies.


Author(s):  
G. Price ◽  
C. Udeh-Momoh ◽  
M. Kivipelto ◽  
L.T. Middleton

Author(s):  
H. Shimada ◽  
S. Lee ◽  
K. Harada ◽  
S. Bae ◽  
K. Makino ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
K.A. Abbott ◽  
J.M. Posma ◽  
I. Garcia-Perez ◽  
C. Udeh-Momoh ◽  
S. Ahmadi-Abhari ◽  
...  

Increasing evidence proposes diet as a notable modifiable factor and viable target for the reduction of Alzheimer’s Disease risk and age-related cognitive decline. However, assessment of dietary exposures is challenged by dietary capture methods that are prone to misreporting and measurement errors. The utility of -omics technologies for the evaluation of dietary exposures has the potential to improve reliability and offer new insights to pre-disease indicators and preventive targets in cognitive aging and dementia. In this review, we present a focused overview of metabolomics as a validation tool and framework for investigating the immediate or cumulative effects of diet on cognitive health.


Author(s):  
J.K. Longhurst ◽  
J.L. Cummings ◽  
S.E. John ◽  
B. Poston ◽  
J.V. Rider ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document