Breaking bad news: a guide for dental healthcare professionals

BDJ ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 186 (6) ◽  
pp. 278-281
Author(s):  
J. Newton ◽  
J. Fiske
BDJ ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 186 (6) ◽  
pp. 278-281 ◽  
Author(s):  
J T Newton ◽  
J Fiske

2020 ◽  
pp. archdischild-2019-318398
Author(s):  
Marije A Brouwer ◽  
Els L M Maeckelberghe ◽  
Agnes van der Heide ◽  
Irma M Hein ◽  
Eduard A A E Verhagen

ObjectiveBreaking bad news about life-threatening and possibly terminal conditions is a crucial part of paediatric care for children in this situation. Little is known about how the parents of children with life-threatening conditions experience communication of bad news. The objective of this study is to analyse parents’ experiences (barriers and facilitators) of communication of bad news.DesignA qualitative study consisting of a constant comparative analysis of in-depth interviews conducted with parents.SettingThe Netherlands.ParticipantsSixty-four parents—bereaved and non-bereaved—of 44 children (aged 1–12 years, 61% deceased) with a life-threatening condition.InterventionsNone.ResultsBased on parents’ experiences, the following 10 barriers to the communication of bad news were identified: (1) a lack of (timely) communication, (2) physicians’ failure to ask parents for input, (3) parents feel unprepared during and after the conversation, (4) a lack of clarity about future treatment, (5) physicians’ failure to voice uncertainties, (6) physicians’ failure to schedule follow-up conversations, (7) presence of too many or unknown healthcare professionals, (8) parental concerns in breaking bad news to children, (9) managing indications of bad news in non-conversational contexts, and (10) parents’ misunderstanding of medical terminology.ConclusionsThis study shows healthcare professionals how parents experience barriers in bad news conversations. This mainly concerns practical aspects of communication. The results provide practical pointers on how the communication of bad news can be improved to better suit the needs of parents. From the parents’ perspective, the timing of conversations in which they were informed that their child might not survive was far too late. Sometimes, no such conversations ever took place.


2001 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 197-205 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sonia Dosanjh ◽  
Judy Barnes ◽  
Mohit Bhandari

2004 ◽  
Vol 5 (03) ◽  
Author(s):  
E Herrmann ◽  
H Ortwein ◽  
A Klambeck ◽  
C Schwarz ◽  
J Schildmann

1992 ◽  
Vol 157 (9) ◽  
pp. 615-621 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rodger C Charlton

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document