The role of the initiation surveillance complex in promoting efficient protein synthesis

2004 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. 585-588 ◽  
Author(s):  
D.R. Gallie
Keyword(s):  
Protein Synthesis ◽  
Ribosomal Subunit ◽  
Initiation Factor ◽  
Viral Mrnas ◽  
Rate Limiting Step ◽  
Complex Functions ◽  
Cellular Mrnas ◽  
Cap Binding Complex ◽  
Regulate Protein

Initiation is most often the rate-limiting step of translation. Translation initiation requires the involvement of numerous factors that assist binding of the 40 S ribosomal subunit to an mRNA and the assembly of the 80 S ribosome at the correct initiation codon. Recruitment of an initiation surveillance complex is required for translation and serves to identify mRNAs that are structurally and functionally competent for translation. For most cellular mRNAs, recruitment of the surveillance complex requires the 5′-cap and 3′-poly(A) tail. However, some cellular and viral mRNAs that naturally lack either of these have evolved alternatives that serve to recruit the complex. The initiation surveillance complex functions to stabilize eIF4F (where eIF stands for eukaryotic initiation factor), the cap-binding complex, to the cap; promote eIF4A helicase activity to remove secondary structure in the 5′-leader that might otherwise reduce 40 S ribosomal subunit scanning; promote eIF4B binding to increase eIF4A/eIF4F function and stabilize binding of the poly(A)-binding protein to the poly(A) tail. The surveillance complex is regulated through changes in phosphorylation in response to environmental conditions or by developmental signals as a means to regulate globally protein synthesis. Thus the initiation surveillance complex ensures that only intact mRNAs are recruited for translation and serves to regulate protein synthesis.

scholarly journals Rotavirus Nonstructural Protein NSP3 Is Not Required for Viral Protein Synthesis

2006 ◽  
Vol 80 (18) ◽  
pp. 9031-9038 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hilda Montero ◽  
Carlos F. Arias ◽  
Susana Lopez
Keyword(s):  
Protein Synthesis ◽  
Viral Protein ◽  
Nonstructural Protein ◽  
Consensus Sequence ◽  
Initiation Factor ◽  
Cell Protein ◽  
Viral Protein Synthesis ◽  
Viral Mrnas ◽  
Initiation Of Translation ◽  
Cellular Mrnas

ABSTRACT Initiation is the rate-limiting step in protein synthesis and therefore an important target for regulation. For the initiation of translation of most cellular mRNAs, the cap structure at the 5′ end is bound by the translation factor eukaryotic initiation factor 4E (eIF4E), while the poly(A) tail, at the 3′ end, is recognized by the poly(A)-binding protein (PABP). eIF4G is a scaffold protein that brings together eIF4E and PABP, causing the circularization of the mRNA that is thought to be important for an efficient initiation of translation. Early in infection, rotaviruses take over the host translation machinery, causing a severe shutoff of cell protein synthesis. Rotavirus mRNAs lack a poly(A) tail but have instead a consensus sequence at their 3′ ends that is bound by the viral nonstructural protein NSP3, which also interacts with eIF4GI, using the same region employed by PABP. It is widely believed that these interactions lead to the translation of rotaviral mRNAs, impairing at the same time the translation of cellular mRNAs. In this work, the expression of NSP3 in infected cells was knocked down using RNA interference. Unexpectedly, under these conditions the synthesis of viral proteins was not decreased, while the cellular protein synthesis was restored. Also, the yield of viral progeny increased, which correlated with an increased synthesis of viral RNA. Silencing the expression of eIF4GI further confirmed that the interaction between eIF4GI and NSP3 is not required for viral protein synthesis. These results indicate that NSP3 is neither required for the translation of viral mRNAs nor essential for virus replication in cell culture.

Cytoskeletal proteins associate with components of the ribosomal maturation and translation apparatus in Xenopus stage I oocytes

Zygote ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 23 (5) ◽  
pp. 669-682 ◽  
Author(s):  
Loredana Chierchia ◽  
Margherita Tussellino ◽  
Domenico Guarino ◽  
Rosa Carotenuto ◽  
Nadia DeMarco ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Protein Synthesis ◽  
Elongation Factor ◽  
Cytoskeletal Proteins ◽  
Stage I ◽  
Initiation Factor ◽  
Perinuclear Region ◽  
Eukaryotic Initiation Factor ◽  
Translation Apparatus ◽  
Ribosomal Stalk

SummaryActin-based cytoskeleton (CSK) and microtubules may bind to RNAs and related molecules implicated in translation. However, many questions remain to be answered regarding the role of cytoskeletal components in supporting the proteins involved in steps in the maturation and translation processes. Here, we performed co-immunoprecipitation and immunofluorescence to examine the association between spectrins, keratins and tubulin and proteins involved in 60S ribosomal maturation and translation in Xenopus stage I oocytes, including ribosomal rpl10, eukaryotic initiation factor 6 (Eif6), thesaurins A/B, homologs of the eEF1α elongation factor, and P0, the ribosomal stalk protein. We found that rpl10 and eif6 cross-reacted with the actin-based CSK and with tubulin. rpl10 co-localizes with spectrin, particularly in the perinuclear region. eif6 is similarly localized. Given that upon ribosomal maturation, the insertion of rpl10 into the 60S subunit occurs simultaneously with the release of eif6, one can hypothesise that actin-based CSK and microtubules provide the necessary scaffold for the insertion/release of these two molecules and, subsequently, for eif6 transport and binding to the mature 60S subunit. P0 and thesaurins cross-reacted with only spectrin and cytokeratins. Thesaurins aggregated at the oocyte periphery, rendering this a territory favourable site for protein synthesis; the CSK may support the interaction between thesaurins and sites of the translating ribosome. Moreover, given that the assembly of the ribosome stalk, where P0 is located, to the 60S subunit is essential for the release of eif6, it can be hypothesised that the CSK can facilitate the binding of the stalk to the 60S.

Alternative mechanisms of initiating translation of mammalian mRNAs

2005 ◽  
Vol 33 (6) ◽  
pp. 1231-1241 ◽  
Author(s):  
R.J. Jackson
Keyword(s):  
Site Selection ◽  
Mammalian Cells ◽  
Ribosomal Subunit ◽  
Aggregate Size ◽  
Mrna Translation ◽  
Initiation Site ◽  
Initiation Factor ◽  
Viral Mrnas ◽  
Initiation Factors ◽  
Scanning Mechanism

Of all the steps in mRNA translation, initiation is the one that differs most radically between prokaryotes and eukaryotes. Not only is there no equivalent of the prokaryotic Shine–Dalgarno rRNA–mRNA interaction, but also what requires only three initiation factor proteins (aggregate size ∼125 kDa) in eubacteria needs at least 28 different polypeptides (aggregate >1600 kDa) in mammalian cells, which is actually larger than the size of the 40 S ribosomal subunit. Translation of the overwhelming majority of mammalian mRNAs occurs by a scanning mechanism, in which the 40 S ribosomal subunit, primed for initiation by the binding of several initiation factors including the eIF2 (eukaryotic initiation factor 2)–GTP–MettRNAi complex, is loaded on the mRNA immediately downstream of the 5′-cap, and then scans the RNA in the 5′→3′ direction. On recognition of (usually) the first AUG triplet via base-pairing with the Met-tRNAi anticodon, scanning ceases, triggering GTP hydrolysis and release of eIF2–GDP. Finally, ribosomal subunit joining and the release of the other initiation factors completes the initiation process. This sketchy outline conceals the fact that the exact mechanism of scanning and the precise roles of the initiation factors remain enigmatic. However, the factor requirements for initiation site selection on some viral IRESs (internal ribosome entry sites/segments) are simpler, and investigations into these IRES-dependent mechanisms (particularly picornavirus, hepatitis C virus and insect dicistrovirus IRESs) have significantly enhanced our understanding of the standard scanning mechanism. This article surveys the various alternative mechanisms of initiation site selection on mammalian (and other eukaryotic) cellular and viral mRNAs, starting from the simplest (in terms of initiation factor requirements) and working towards the most complex, which paradoxically happens to be the reverse order of their discovery.

scholarly journals A Complementary Mechanism of Bacterial mRNA Translation Inhibition by Tetracyclines

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Victor Barrenechea ◽  
Maryhory Vargas-Reyes ◽  
Miguel Quiliano ◽  
Pohl Milón
Keyword(s):  
Protein Synthesis ◽  
Translation Initiation ◽  
Ribosomal Subunit ◽  
Mrna Translation ◽  
Resistance Mechanisms ◽  
Dissociation Rate ◽  
Initiation Factor ◽  
Translation Elongation ◽  
Initiation Phase ◽  
Complementary Mechanism

Tetracycline has positively impacted human health as well as the farming and animal industries. Its extensive usage and versatility led to the spread of resistance mechanisms followed by the development of new variants of the antibiotic. Tetracyclines inhibit bacterial growth by impeding the binding of elongator tRNAs to the ribosome. However, a small number of reports indicated that Tetracyclines could also inhibit translation initiation, yet the molecular mechanism remained unknown. Here, we use biochemical and computational methods to study how Oxytetracycline (Otc), Demeclocycline (Dem), and Tigecycline (Tig) affect the translation initiation phase of protein synthesis. Our results show that all three Tetracyclines induce Initiation Factor IF3 to adopt a compact conformation on the 30S ribosomal subunit, similar to that induced by Initiation Factor IF1. This compaction was faster for Tig than Dem or Otc. Furthermore, all three tested tetracyclines affected IF1-bound 30S complexes. The dissociation rate constant of IF1 in early 30S complexes was 14-fold slower for Tig than Dem or Otc. Late 30S initiation complexes (30S pre-IC or IC) exhibited greater IF1 stabilization by Tig than for Dem and Otc. Tig and Otc delayed 50S joining to 30S initiation complexes (30S ICs). Remarkably, the presence of Tig considerably slowed the progression to translation elongation and retained IF1 in the resulting 70S initiation complex (70S IC). Molecular modeling of Tetracyclines bound to the 30S pre-IC and 30S IC indicated that the antibiotics binding site topography fluctuates along the initiation pathway. Mainly, 30S complexes show potential contacts between Dem or Tig with IF1, providing a structural rationale for the enhanced affinity of the antibiotics in the presence of the factor. Altogether, our data indicate that Tetracyclines inhibit translation initiation by allosterically perturbing the IF3 layout on the 30S, retaining IF1 during 70S IC formation, and slowing the transition toward translation elongation. Thus, this study describes a new complementary mechanism by which Tetracyclines may inhibit bacterial protein synthesis.

scholarly journals PABP1 and eIF4GI associate with influenza virus NS1 protein in viral mRNA translation initiation complexes

2003 ◽  
Vol 84 (12) ◽  
pp. 3263-3274 ◽  
Author(s):  
Idoia Burgui ◽  
Tomás Aragón ◽  
Juan Ortín ◽  
Amelia Nieto
Keyword(s):  
Influenza Virus ◽  
Translation Initiation ◽  
Mrna Translation ◽  
Translation Initiation Factor ◽  
Initiation Factor ◽  
Published Data ◽  
Ns1 Protein ◽  
Viral Mrnas ◽  
Independent Manner ◽  
Cellular Mrnas

It has previously been shown that influenza virus NS1 protein enhances the translation of viral but not cellular mRNAs. This enhancement occurs by increasing the rate of translation initiation and requires the 5′UTR sequence, common to all viral mRNAs. In agreement with these findings, we show here that viral mRNAs, but not cellular mRNAs, are associated with NS1 during virus infection. We have previously reported that NS1 interacts with the translation initiation factor eIF4GI, next to its poly(A)-binding protein 1 (PABP1)-interacting domain and that NS1 and eIF4GI are associated in influenza virus-infected cells. Here we show that NS1, although capable of binding poly(A), does not compete with PABP1 for association with eIF4GI and, furthermore, that NS1 and PABP1 interact both in vivo and in vitro in an RNA-independent manner. The interaction maps between residues 365 and 535 in PABP1 and between residues 1 and 81 in NS1. These mapping studies, together with those previously reported for NS1–eIF4GI and PABP1–eIF4GI interactions, imply that the binding of all three proteins would be compatible. Collectively, these and previously published data suggest that NS1 interactions with eIF4GI and PABP1, as well as with viral mRNAs, could promote the specific recruitment of 43S complexes to the viral mRNAs.

Regulation of translation initiation by herpesviruses

2008 ◽  
Vol 36 (4) ◽  
pp. 701-707 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard W.P. Smith ◽  
Sheila V. Graham ◽  
Nicola K. Gray
Keyword(s):  
Protein Synthesis ◽  
Translational Control ◽  
Translational Regulation ◽  
Large Family ◽  
Cell Protein ◽  
Viral Protein Synthesis ◽  
Viral Mrnas ◽  
Dna Viruses ◽  
Protein Synthesis Machinery ◽  
Regulate Protein

Viruses are dependent upon the host cell protein synthesis machinery, thus they have developed a range of strategies to manipulate host translation to favour viral protein synthesis. Consequently, the study of viral translation has been a powerful tool for illuminating many aspects of cellular translational control. Although much work to date has focused on translational regulation by RNA viruses, DNA viruses have also evolved complex mechanisms to regulate protein synthesis. Here we summarize work on a large family of DNA viruses, the Herpesviridae, which have evolved mechanisms to sustain efficient cap-dependent translation and to regulate the translation of specific viral mRNAs.

scholarly journals Assembly of 48S Translation Initiation Complexesfrom Purified Components with mRNAs That Have Some Base Pairingwithin Their 5′ UntranslatedRegions

2003 ◽  
Vol 23 (24) ◽  
pp. 8925-8933 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sergei E. Dmitriev ◽  
Ilya M. Terenin ◽  
Yan E. Dunaevsky ◽  
William C. Merrick ◽  
Ivan N. Shatsky
Keyword(s):  
Translation Initiation ◽  
Mammalian Cells ◽  
Ribosomal Subunit ◽  
Initiation Factor ◽  
Beta Globin ◽  
Globin Mrna ◽  
Initiation Factors ◽  
40S Ribosomal Subunit ◽  
Cellular Mrnas ◽  
Actin Mrna

ABSTRACT The reconstitution of translation initiation complexes from purified components is a reliable approach to determine the complete set of essential canonical initiation factors and auxiliary proteins required for the 40S ribosomal subunit to locate the initiation codon on individual mRNAs. Until now, it has been successful mostly for formation of 48S translation initiation complexes with viral IRES elements. Among cap-dependent mRNAs, only globin mRNAs and transcripts with artificial 5′ leaders were amenable to this assembly. Here, with modified conditions for the reconstitution, 48S complexes have been successfully assembled with the 5′ UTR of beta-actin mRNA (84 nucleotides) and the tripartite leader of adenovirus RNAs (232 nucleotides), though the latter has been able to use only the scanning rather then the shunting model of translation initiation with canonical initiation factors. We show that initiation factor 4B is essential for mRNAs that have even a rather moderate base pairing within their 5′ UTRs (with the cumulative stability of the secondary structure within the entire 5′ UTR < −13 kcal/mol) and not essential for beta-globin mRNA. A recombinant eIF4B poorly substitutes for the native factor. The 5′ UTRs with base-paired G residues reveal a very sharp dependence on the eIF4B concentration to form the 48S complex. The data suggest that even small variations in concentration or activity of eIF4B in mammalian cells may differentially affect the translation of different classes of cap-dependent cellular mRNAs.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document