Auditory and Audiovisual Reception of Words in Low-Frequency Noise by Children with Normal Hearing and by Children with Impaired Hearing

1971 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 496-512 ◽  
Author(s):  
Norman P. Erber

Common words (monosyllables, trochees, spondees) were presented in low-frequency noise to children who attempted to detect their acoustic patterns or to recognize them under a range of acoustic speech-to-noise (S/N) ratios. Both profoundly deaf (−10 dB) and severely hearing-impaired children (−17 dB) required higher S/N ratios for auditory detection of words than did children with normal hearing (−23 dB). The normals (92%) were superior to the severely hearing-impaired group (57%) in auditory recognition of words in noise, while the deaf group (3%) were unable to recognize words by ear alone. The deaf group were poor even at classifying the stimulus words by stress pattern. Provision of acoustic cues increased the audio-visual (AV) scores of normal-hearing and severely hearing-impaired subjects 54% and 33% respectively above lipreading alone, but it improved the lipreading performance of profoundly deaf subjects only 9%. Improvement in AV recognition depended for all groups upon their detection of acoustic cues for speech. The profoundly deaf children achieved their maximum AV scores only at a higher S/N ratio (+5 dB) than that for the severely hearing-impaired group (0 dB), who in turn required a higher S/N ratio for maximum AV recognition than did the normals (−10 dB).

Author(s):  
S. Yamada ◽  
M. Ikuji ◽  
S. Fujikata ◽  
T. Watanabe ◽  
T. Kosaka

Comparison of the thresholds of body sensation of profoundly deaf subjects and those of normal hearing, when exposed to intense low frequency noise, showed similar trends. Since the deaf subjects were judged to have normal balance mechanisms, it was concluded that the semicircular canals are not sensitive to low frequency noise at its normal levels in the environment.


1971 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 793-803 ◽  
Author(s):  
Agnes H. Ling

Ear asymmetry for dichotic digits was used in an attempt to estimate speech laterality in 19 children with impaired hearing and 19 with normal hearing. Sequences of digits were also presented monaurally. The normal-hearing group was significantly superior to the hearing-impaired in the recall of both monaural and dichotic digits. No ear advantage was observed for either group on the monaural test. Right-ear dichotic scores were significantly superior for the normal-hearing group, but intersubject variability resulted in a nonsignificant right-ear trend for the hearing-impaired group, with individuals showing marked right- or left-ear advantage. No correlation was found between degree of ear asymmetry on the dichotic test and vocabulary scores for hearing-impaired subjects. Both members of a dichotic pair were rarely reported by hearing-impaired subjects, with one digit apparently masking or suppressing the other. It was concluded that speech lateralization could not safely be inferred from dichotic digit scores of hearing-impaired children.


Vestnik MEI ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (5) ◽  
pp. 120-127
Author(s):  
Mikhail D. Vorobyev ◽  
◽  
Dmitriy N. Yudaev ◽  
Andrey Yu. Zorin ◽  
◽  
...  

1999 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles K. Birdsall ◽  
J. P. Varboncoeur ◽  
P. J. Christensen

2021 ◽  
Vol 182 ◽  
pp. 108203
Author(s):  
Lígia T. Silva ◽  
Alda Magalhães ◽  
José Ferreira Silva ◽  
Fernando Fonseca

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document