Technology - Blog. Bizarre Tech - Trippy Paint; Cellfie; Pisces: A Kinetic Art Lamp

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (9) ◽  
pp. 79-79
Author(s):  
R. Northfield
Keyword(s):  
Leonardo ◽  
1970 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 433
Author(s):  
Valerios Caloutsis
Keyword(s):  

Leonardo ◽  
1991 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 493
Author(s):  
Roger F. Malina ◽  
Jim Jenkins ◽  
Dave Quick
Keyword(s):  

Leonardo ◽  
1979 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 125
Author(s):  
Thorbjorn Lausten
Keyword(s):  

Leonardo ◽  
1982 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 188 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. Christian Sidenius ◽  
Raymond M. Farrell
Keyword(s):  

CeROArt ◽  
2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olivier Steib
Keyword(s):  

2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 221-228
Author(s):  
박정화 ◽  
Joo Yun Kim
Keyword(s):  

Leonardo ◽  
1972 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 255 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frank J. Malina ◽  
Pierre Schaeffer
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Irina N. Zakharchenko ◽  
◽  
Olga M. Shchedrina ◽  

For the first time in the Russian-speaking academic environment the authors of the paper analyze the creative legacy of the scientist, aeronautical engineer and artist Frank Joseph Malina (1912–1981). His working practices reflected the most important ethic and aesthetic aspirations of the mid-twentieth century, what became an important contribution to the development of modern visual culture. The pioneer of Lumino Kinetic art F.Malina created several unique electromechanical systems for the production of an image, the media infrastructure and technological nature of which would later become the visual standard of the digital age. The discovery of electric light as a new artistic medium allowed him to focus on the production methods, control and processing algorithms for light that produces images. The Lumino Kinetic experiments of F. Malina are based on understanding the new nature of the image, born during the era of scientific discoveries. Several decades before the iconic turn was proclaimed by academic science, they presented the image as a system of relations that is formed in acts of perception and that is not based on visible, but felt, ideated, imagined reality. While creating his works F. Malina dreamed of modeling qualitatively new perceptual conditions for the existence of mankind aimed at further progress and traveling to the stars.


Author(s):  
María C. Gaztambide

Chapter 1 maps how petroleum development revenue allowed Venezuelans to acquire and not produce the same type of modernity that had been created elsewhere in response to vastly different conditions. Instead functionalism and the varied genealogies of Constructivism, geometric abstraction and kinetic art in particular, became the architectural and aesthetic signposts of this elusive paradigm. Yet internal conditions limited the reach of these ideologically “neutral” international tendencies as well as of the overarching national modernization project of which they were a part. A close examination of extant texts and photographs by El Techo reveals how the group challenged the cultural establishment, exposed its political dissidence, and anchored its project in the harsh material reality of the human underbelly that fuelled the dreams of progress in Venezuela.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document